Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 21;16(3):318–336. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2020.07.003

Table 2.

A summary of various composite nanosystems of sorafenib with other agents.

Drug-loaded Structure Therapies Observations Ref.
Sorafenib/Doxorubicin Nanoparticle constructed from PEG-b-CD amphiphiles. Chemotherapy/Chemotherapy In vitro studies showed that the nanoparticles had stronger inhibitory effect against HepG2 cells as compared to the physical mixtures of two drugs group. [96]
Sorafenib/Doxorubicin Nanoparticle using PVA as the nano-core and HSA as the nano-shell. Chemotherapy/Chemotherapy This core-shell nanoparticle showed enhanced cellular uptake and synergistic cytotoxicity in ∼92% of HCC cells. [97]
Sorafenib/Paclitaxel HA functionalized liposomes with TPGS and PLL-DA co-modifications. Chemotherapy/Chemotherapy The liposome demonstrated an enhanced antitumor effect in vivo, with a tumor growth inhibition rate of 78.52%. [101]
Sorafenib/Cisplatin Nanoparticles constructed by crosslinking HA with cisplatin. Chemotherapy/Chemotherapy The nanoparticles displayed synergistic tumor-killing effects after prolonged circulation time valid tumor accumulation [103]
Sorafneib/Ursolic acid A chitosan and lactobionic acid co-modified MSN Chemotherapy/Chemotherapy In vivo studies showed significant tumor burden decrease and lung metastasis inhibition of the nanoparticle in H22 tumor-bearing mice model. [33]
Sorafenib/IMD-0354 Lipid-based twin-like core–shell nanoparticles. Chemotherapy/ Immunotherapy In vivo studies showed the superior synergistic antitumor efficacy and M2-type TAM polarization ability of twin-like core–shell nanoparticles as compared to free sorafenib. [116]
Sorafenib/CA IX-C4.16 Nanoparticles which comprised of vitamin-E-α-D-tocopherol and styrene maleic anhydride. Chemotherapy/ Immunotherapy Significant tumor accumulation and higher tumor growth inhibition of the nanoparticles were observed in mice models. [117]
Sorafenib/AMD3100 CXCR4 antagonist (AMD3100)-modified lipid-PLGA nanoparticles. Chemotherapy/ Immunotherapy It displayed enhanced antiangiogenic effect and delayed tumor progression in the HCC models as compared to control groups. [31]
Sorafenib/AMD3100/anti-PD-1 antibody AMD3100-modified nanosystems which loading with sorafenib and anti-PD1 antibody. Chemotherapy/ Immunotherapy This nanosystem effectively blocked the pathways of CXCR4 and PD-1, which prevented suppression of immune cells function in tumors. [110]
Sorafenib/Indocyanine A Pluronic F127-shielding carrier-free nanodrug. Chemotherapy/ PDT The nanoparticles had improved stability and bioavailability and could specifically target tumor tissues via the EPR effect in vivo. [123]
Sorafenib/Dihydroartemisinin A low density lipoprotein receptor -functionalized lipid nanoparticle. Chemotherapy/ PDT Strong antitumor response and inhibited tumor growth were observed in lipid nanoparticle-treated xenograft tumor models. [144]
Sorafenib/Chlorin e6 A carrier-free multifunctional nanoparticle. Chemotherapy/ PDT This nanoparticle could effectively cut off the tumor blood vessels and kill cancer cells simultaneously at a rather low dosage (200 µg/kg) in vivo. [124]
Sorafenib/IR780 iodide A GPC3 targeting peptide-modified liposome. Chemotherapy/ PDT This liposomal nanosystem showed imaging ability and synergistic precise antitumor effect in vivo with marked tumor suppression. [130]
Sorafenib/siRNA PEI-modified liposomes. Chemotherapy/ Gene therapy Intravenous injection of this liposomal formulation effectively inhibited tumor growth and also increased the survival rates of animals. [134]
Sorafenib/Retinoic acid/miRNA PEGylated solid lipid nanoparticles were further modified with miRNA. Chemotherapy/ Chemotherapy /Gene therapy The solid lipid nanoparticles induced significantly enhanced apoptotic effect in gastric cancer cells. In vivo studies clearly showed improved antitumor efficacy of the nanoparticles. [136]
Sorafenib/PEDF gene PEG-PLGA based nanoparticles Chemotherapy /Gene therapy This drug-loading nanoparticle displayed the most effective tumor growth inhibition in the C26 cells and C26-bearing mice as compared to other control groups. [139]