Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;12(3):1086–1100. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-205

Table 3. Significantly enriched hallmarks in the TCGA cohort by GSEA.

Name Size NES NOM p-val FDR q-val Signal score
HALLMARK_BILE_ACID_METABOLISM 112 2.35 0.00E+00 7.00E-04 Low
HALLMARK_XENOBIOTIC_METABOLISM 200 2.24 0.00E+00 7.00E-04 Low
HALLMARK_COAGULATION 138 2.05 0.00E+00 7.19E-03 Low
HALLMARK_FATTY_ACID_METABOLISM 158 2.03 1.84E-03 6.52E-03 Low
HALLMARK_PEROXISOME 103 1.94 1.89E-03 1.45E-02 Low
HALLMARK_ADIPOGENESIS 200 1.93 3.74E-03 1.24E-02 Low
HALLMARK_HEME_METABOLISM 197 1.62 8.13E-03 1.06E-01 Low
HALLMARK_G2M_CHECKPOINT 197 −2.27 0.00E+00 4.52E-03 High
HALLMARK_E2F_TARGETS 200 −2.14 0.00E+00 5.00E-03 High
HALLMARK_MYC_TARGETS_V1 199 −2.09 2.04E-03 6.13E-03 High
HALLMARK_MTORC1_SIGNALING 200 −1.94 6.21E-03 2.81E-02 High
HALLMARK_MYC_TARGETS_V2 58 −1.87 2.08E-02 4.07E-02 High
HALLMARK_DNA_REPAIR 149 −1.83 9.94E-03 4.81E-02 High
HALLMARK_MITOTIC_SPINDLE 198 −1.69 3.41E-02 1.09E-01 High
HALLMARK_UNFOLDED_PROTEIN_RESPONSE 112 −1.68 2.29E-02 1.05E-01 High
HALLMARK_UV_RESPONSE_UP 158 −1.62 2.52E-03 1.32E-01 High
HALLMARK_SPERMATOGENESIS 133 −1.54 2.91E-02 1.79E-01 High

TGCA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; GESA, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis; NES, Normalized Enrichment Score; NOM p-val, Nominal p value.