Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;10(6):2762–2786. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1295

Table 4. AS patient characteristics for selection for entry into AS.

Study Selection
process
Mean age (yrs) Mean size of tumour (cm) CCI grade Baseline kidney function Histology Comment on patient selection
All
patients
AS
patients
All
patients
AS
patients
All
patients
AS
patients
All
patients
AS
patients
All
patients
AS
patients
University of Michigan (15) Retrospective analysis of prospectively entered SRM database 60 63 2.9 2.3 CCI ≥2
48%
CCI ≥2
45%
eGFR
≤60 mL/min
22%
eGFR ≤60 mL/min
21%
37% had RMB in
treatment group
41% had RMB The combination of tumour size <3 cm, performance status ≥2 and endophytic lesion were most predictive of AS
Fox Chase Cancer Center (16) Retrospective analysis of prospectively entered kidney tumour database 63 71 3 2.6 CCI ≥3
27%
CCI ≥3 55% CKD
stage ≥3
22%
CKD
stage ≥3
37%
n/r n/r Characteristics associated with use of AS included CCI 1-2, CCI ≥3, solitary kidney, bilateral disease
NCDB (17) Retrospective sample 60.1 70.6 2.6 2.6 CCI ≥3
3.4%
CCI ≥3 5.7% n/r n/r n/r n/r Increasing age associated with more likely to be managed with ablation or AS
Cleveland Clinic (18) Retrospective analysis of prospectively entered kidney tumour database 79* 81* 3.3* 2.3* CCI ≥2
42%
CCI ≥2 65% CKD
stage ≥3
45%
CKD
stage ≥3
54%
RCC 39%; Benign 21%; Other cancer 20%; Unknown 20% RCC 1.9%; Benign 3.8%; Unknown 94% Patients on AS were older and had greater comorbidity
University of Toronto (19) Prospective AS cohort n/a 74 n/a 2.3* n/a n/r n/a n/r n/a 7/82 had RMB; 2/7 RCC; 5/7 inadequate samples Eligibility criteria: renal mass ≤7 cm, not surgical candidates due to advanced age, significant comorbidities or patient refusal
DISSRM, 2015† (20) Prospective registry 62* 71* 2.5* 1.9* CCI 1-3
37%
CCI 1-3
51%
CKD
7.3%
CKD
9.9%
3.6% had RMB in intervention group of which: oncocytoma 20%; RCC 70%; Non diagnostic 10% 9.4% had RMB of which: Oncocytoma 43%; RCC 29%;
Non-diagnostic 24%
AS patients were older, had worse ECOG scores, total comorbidities and cardiovascular comorbidities, with tumours more likely to be multiple, smaller or bilateral
Canada (22) Prospective non-comparative clinical trial of AS n/a 73 n/a 2.1 n/a n/r n/a n/r n/r All trial patients asked to
undergo RMB
Eligibility criteria: T1a renal mass on imaging, deemed by physician to be unfit for surgery due to advanced age, comorbidity or refusal of other treatment
Oxford, 2012† (23) Retrospective analysis of local cancer database 62.1 71.9 2.6 2.3 n/r n/r n/r n/r n/r 7/71 had RMB of which: 2/7 RCC; 2/7Oncocytoma; 3/7 Non-diagnostic AS patients were significantly older. No significant difference in tumour size between AS and treatment groups (RN and PN)
Haifa (25) Retrospective analysis of AS cohort n/a 68 n/a 1.9 n/a Mean
CCI =4.5
n/a n/r n/a n/r Inclusion criteria for AS: risk factors for end stage renal disease, multiple major medical comorbidities, patient preference
University of Michigan, 2016 (26) Retrospective analysis of AS cohort n/a 66 n/a 2.0 n/a ECOG 0 60%, ECOG 1 21%, ECOG 2 14% n/a eGFR m/min Mean
74.6
n/a 51/118 had RMB of which: Benign 37%; Malignant 35%; Non-diagnostic 28% No specific inclusion criteria for AS enrolment mentioned
Pusan National
University (27)
Prospective AS cohort n/a 64 n/a 1.8 n/a CCI ≥3 19% n/a n/r n/a 32% No specific inclusion criteria for AS enrolment mentioned
Tayside (28) Prospective AS cohort n/a 69.8 n/a 2.2 n/a Median
number of comorbidities =2
n/a eGFR ≤60ml/min
35%
n/a n/r No specific criteria for management with AS mentioned
MD
Anderson (30)
Prospective AS cohort n/a 68.5 n/a 1.74 n/a Mean CCI =5.8 n/a Mean eGFR mL/min =72.4 n/a 45% had RMB of which: RCC 50%; Benign 36%;
Non-diagnostic 10%
AS was recommended for elderly patients with significant comorbidities, for those undergoing active non-RCC-related cancer treatment, or for patients refusing surgery

AS, active surveillance; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; CKD, chronic kidney disease; PI, primary intervention; PN, partial nephrectomy; RN, radical nephrectomy; SRM, small renal mass. *median value instead of mean; comparator group is patient receiving primary intervention rather than all patients.