Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 6;6(1):e000649. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000649

Table 3.

Multivariable analysis of depression and anxiety scores

Depression score Anxiety score
Coefficient (95% CI) P value Coefficient (95% CI) P value
OSDI (per 10 unit increase) 12% (7% to 16%) <0.001 12% (7% to 16%) <0.001
Employment 0.040 N.S.
Full/part/self
Student/unemployed 48% (11% to 96%) 0.007
House-wife/husband 28% (−6% to 76%) 0.121
Retired 21% (−3% to 52%) 0.093
Eye drops per day 0.300 0.009
None or as required
1–4 20% (−7% to 54%) 0.153 36% (5% to 77%) 0.022
5+ 7% (−19% to 41%) 0.651 57% (17% to 110%) 0.003

Results are from general linear models, with the log-transformed depression/anxiety scores as the dependent variables. A backward stepwise approach was used to select variables, with the following considered for inclusion: age, gender, ethnicity, education, employment, disease subgroup (OSD/Uveitis), OSDI, steroid use and eye drop frequency. The coefficients were then anti-logged and represent the percentage increase in the anxiety/depression score for the stated category relative to the reference, or for a 10-unit increase in OSDI. Bold p values are significant at p<0.05. N.S.=not selected by the stepwise procedure for inclusion in the final model.

OSD, ocular surface disease.