Skip to main content
. 2021 May 26;49(W1):W469–W475. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab398

Table 1.

Performance comparisons of NetGO 2.0 with its component and competing methods against testing data

F-max AUPR Coverage
MFO BPO CCO MFO BPO CCO MFO BPO CCO
Naïve 0.416 0.256 0.542 0.276 0.118 0.464 1.00 1.00 1.00
Blast-KNN 0.632 0.312 0.566 0.542 0.132 0.405 0.91 0.88 0.81
LR-3mer 0.427 0.258 0.552 0.317 0.125 0.478 1.00 1.00 1.00
LR-InterPro 0.651 0.325 0.641 0.623 0.166 0.587 1.00 1.00 1.00
Net-KNN 0.519 0.325 0.596 0.416 0.192 0.528 0.99 0.99 0.98
RNN 0.524 0.265 0.574 0.424 0.124 0.477 1.00 1.00 1.00
LR-Text 0.464 0.248 0.479 0.353 0.154 0.403 0.72 0.46 0.66
DeepGOPlus 0.620 0.305 0.620 0.521 0.115 0.493 1.00 1.00 1.00
GOLabeler 0.667 0.326 0.631 0.647 0.193 0.557 1.00 1.00 1.00
NetGO 0.674 0.362 0.646 0.653 0.239 0.583 1.00 1.00 1.00
NetGO 2.0 0.666 0.366 0.663 0.655 0.269 0.593 1.00 1.00 1.00