TABLE 1.
Comparison of Model Objectives Between Two Piloted Scenarios
| Objectives | Burn Scenario | Hypoxia Scenario |
|---|---|---|
| Initial assessment and interventions | Accuracy of burn size | Identification of possible causes of hypoxiaAdministration of antibiotics for pneumonia/sepsis |
| Initial fluid resuscitation rate | ||
| Recognition of need to evacuate/attempts to do so | ||
| Recognition of need to evacuate/attempts to do so | ||
| Resuscitation | Completion of Lund and Browder chart | 20–30 mL/kg fluid bolus according to sepsis guidelines |
| Calculation of formal fluid requirements | Urinary catheter placement | |
| Urinary catheter placement | ||
| Identification and management of complications | Lower extremity eschar syndrome | Worsening hypoxia with fluid resuscitation |
| Lower extremity escharotomy | ||
| Cessation of crystalloid fluids | ||
| Ongoing resuscitation | Adjustment of hourly fluid rate according to urine output | Tolerance of mild hypotension given adequate urine output |
| Wound care | Initiation of oxygen therapy | |
| Patient positioning (upright) | ||
| Possible noninvasive positive pressure ventilation | ||
| Identification and management of complications | Recognition of the need for intubation to protect airway | Recognition of need to intubate to protect airway and provide mechanical ventilation |
| Intubate or perform cricothyrotomy | ||
| Intubate or perform cricothyrotomy | ||
| Ongoing management | Analgesia and sedation management | Analgesia and sedation management |
| Continued fluid adjustment according to urine output | ||
| Identification and management of complications | Tension pneumothorax from positive pressure ventilation | |
| Needle decompression followed by tube thoracostomy | ||
| Documentation | Care documentation accuracy and completeness throughout | Care documentation accuracy and completeness throughout |
| Duration | 8 hr real time, 14 hr simulation time | 8 hr real time, 14 hr simulation time |