Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 6;3(7):e0477. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000477

TABLE 1.

Comparison of Model Objectives Between Two Piloted Scenarios

Objectives Burn Scenario Hypoxia Scenario
Initial assessment and interventions Accuracy of burn size Identification of possible causes of hypoxiaAdministration of antibiotics for pneumonia/sepsis
Initial fluid resuscitation rate
Recognition of need to evacuate/attempts to do so
Recognition of need to evacuate/attempts to do so
Resuscitation Completion of Lund and Browder chart 20–30 mL/kg fluid bolus according to sepsis guidelines
Calculation of formal fluid requirements Urinary catheter placement
Urinary catheter placement
Identification and management of complications Lower extremity eschar syndrome Worsening hypoxia with fluid resuscitation
Lower extremity escharotomy
Cessation of crystalloid fluids
Ongoing resuscitation Adjustment of hourly fluid rate according to urine output Tolerance of mild hypotension given adequate urine output
Wound care Initiation of oxygen therapy
Patient positioning (upright)
Possible noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
Identification and management of complications Recognition of the need for intubation to protect airway Recognition of need to intubate to protect airway and provide mechanical ventilation
Intubate or perform cricothyrotomy
Intubate or perform cricothyrotomy
Ongoing management Analgesia and sedation management Analgesia and sedation management
Continued fluid adjustment according to urine output
Identification and management of complications Tension pneumothorax from positive pressure ventilation
Needle decompression followed by tube thoracostomy
Documentation Care documentation accuracy and completeness throughout Care documentation accuracy and completeness throughout
Duration 8 hr real time, 14 hr simulation time 8 hr real time, 14 hr simulation time