Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 24;9:647038. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.647038

Table 3.

NTD: numbers of pregnancies and the prevalence if fortification had occurred from 1998 to 2017 according to European country.

Country EU member Assuming no supplementation occurred Assuming 25% of women took supplements (47)
2017 1998 Prevalence per
1,000 births
Prevalence per 1,000 births with fortification Percentage reduction due to fortification (%) Estimated NTD pregnancies prevented Prevalence per 1,000 births with fortification Percentage reduction due to fortification (%) Estimated NTD pregnancies prevented
Austria Y Y 0.71 0.53 25 279 0.57 19 209
Belgium Y Y 0.75 0.60 20 369 0.63 15 276
Denmark Y Y 1.12 0.80 28 394 0.88 21 296
Finland Y Y 0.90 0.70 23 234 0.75 17 175
France Y Y 1.16 0.93 20 3,735 0.99 15 2,801
Germany Y Y 1.02 0.82 20 2,893 0.87 15 2,170
Greeceb Y Y 0.57 0.46 18 214 0.49 14 160
Ireland Y Y 0.93 0.75 18 222 0.80 14 166
Italy Y Y 0.57 0.43 25 1,526 0.46 19 1,145
Luxembourga Y Y 0.87 0.70 20 20 0.74 15 15
Netherlands Y Y 0.82 0.55 32 962 0.62 24 721
Portugal Y Y 0.43 0.35 19 168 0.37 14 126
Spain Y Y 0.85 0.69 18 1,332 0.73 14 999
Sweden Y Y 0.79 0.64 19 315 0.67 14 237
United Kingdom Y Y 1.22 0.99 18 3,344 1.05 14 2,508
Bulgaria Y N 1.63 1.26 22 510 1.35 17 382
Croatia Y N 0.49 0.36 28 112 0.39 21 84
Cyprusb Y N 0.57 0.47 17 25 0.49 13 18
Czech Republic Y N 0.73 0.59 20 306 0.62 15 230
Estoniac Y N 0.90 0.70 23 58 0.75 17 43
Hungary Y N 0.64 0.54 16 193 0.56 12 145
Latviad Y N 0.82 0.64 22 77 0.68 17 58
Lithuaniad Y N 0.82 0.64 22 115 0.69 17 86
Malta Y N 0.92 0.76 17 13 0.80 13 10
Poland Y N 0.77 0.61 20 1,173 0.65 15 879
Romaniae Y N 0.77 0.61 22 746 0.65 17 559
Slovak Republicf Y N 0.53 0.43 18 106 0.46 13 80
Sloveniag Y N 0.74 0.57 22 65 0.62 17 49
Norway N N 0.84 0.57 32 312 0.63 24 234
Switzerland N N 0.87 0.69 21 286 0.73 16 214
Ukraine N N 1.80 0.91 49 8,047 1.13 37 6,035
Countries in EU in 1998 0.95 21 16,007 15 12,005
Countries in EU in 2019 0.92 21 19,504 15 14,628
a

For Luxembourg the prevalence was assumed to be the same as that in Switzerland.

b

For Greece and Cyprus the prevalence was assumed to be the same as that in Italy.

c

For Estonia the prevalence was assumed to be the same as that in Finland.

d

For Latvia and Lithuania the prevalence was assumed to be the same as the mean of Poland, Finland and Sweden.

e

For Romania the prevalence was assumed to be the same as that in Poland.

f

Prevalence in Slovak Republic from Behunova et al. (20).

g

Prevalence in Slovenia from Kokalj et al. (21).

The prevalence may differ slightly from that in Table 1 as in Table 3 it is the prevalence over the whole time period from 1998 to 2017 and in Table 1 it is the prevalence for the years of available data.