Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;10(6):2917–2936. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-15

Table 5. Objective response rates and disease control rates in studies including poor PS patients.

Reference Patients Poor PS patients ORR DCR PD Statistics PS 0-1 vs.
poor PS, (95% CI)
Total PS 0-1 Poor PS Total PS 0-1 Poor PS Total PS 0-1 Poor PS
Hasegawa, Anticancer Res 2019 (35) 51 5 PS ≥2 NA 59% 63% 20% 41% 37% 80% P=0.146
Kuzminin, WCLC 2019 (36) 74 9 PS =2
3 NE
50%* NA NA 75%* 79%* 33%* 25%* 21%* 66%* P=0.03 DCR
Imai, J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020 (39) 47 ≥75 y 7 PS =2;
3 PS =3
2 NE
NA 61%* 43%* NA 89%* 43%* NA 11%* 57%* P=0.15 RR, P=0.03 DCR
Morita, BMC Cancer 2020 (40) 205 29 PS =2;
6 PS =3;
1 PS =4
NA 55% 42% NA 77% 64% NA 23% 36% Multivariate: OR 1.44 (0.57–3.59), P=0.4366 for response; P=0.0832 within poor PS group, trend towards lack of response
Facchinetti, Eur J Cancer 2020 (29) 153 153 PS =2 21% 37% 63%
Cortellini, Cancer Immunol Immunother 2020 (28) 1026 179 PS ≥2
36 NE
NA 48%* 25%* NA NA NA NA NA NA P<0.0001, Multivariate: OR 2.60 (1.73–3.91); P<0.0001
Alessi, J Immunother Cancer 2020 (44) 234 39 PS =2 NA 43% 26% NA NA NA NA NA NA P=0.04
Friedlaender, Acta Oncol 2020 (45) 302 56 PS =2 NA 72% 45% NA NA NA NA NA NA OR 0.31 (0.17–0.57)
Seban, Cancers (Basel) 2020 (46) 63 13 PS ≥2 58% NA NA 65% NA NA 35% NA NA RR: OR 1.3 (0.4–4.9), P=0.69; DCR: OR 1.8 (0.5–6.3), P=0.34
Yamaguchi, Sci Rep 2020 (50) 48 12 PS =2;
6 PS =3
2 NE
NA 52%* 50%* 73% NA NA NA NA NA P>0.99
Inaba‐Higashiyama, Thorac Cancer 2020 (53) 4 4 PS =3 25%§ 25%§

*, only TC-evaluated patients considered in calculating the rates (i.e., non evaluated patients are not included in the analyses). §, Patient with PD-L1 =100%. y, years; PS, performance status; NE, not evaluated; ORR, objective response rate; NA, not available; DCR, disease control rate; PD, progressive disease; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.