Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun;10(6):3014–3028. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-1239

Table 1. Phase III studies of anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 mAbs in aNSCLC with subgroup analysis data in the elderly population.

Author (year) Study Phase Histology Line Treatment arms No. of patients Median age (years) Age cut-off, older patients No. of older [%] Overall survivals
Overall HR (95% CI) HR for younger (95% CI) HR for older (95% CI)
Borghaei (2015) CheckMate 057 III Nonsquamous NSCLC >1 Nivo vs. Docetaxel 582 61.0 [37–84]; 64.0 [21–85] 65–74; ≥75 200 [34]; 43 [7] 0.73 (0.59–0.89) 0.81 (0.62–1.04) 0.63 (0.45–0.89);
0.90 (0.43–1.87)
Brahmer (2015) CheckMate 017 III Squamous NSCLC >1 Nivo vs. Docetaxel 272 62.0 [39–85]; 64 [42–84] 65–74; ≥75 91 [33]; 29 [11] 0.59 (0.44–0.79) 0.52 (0.35–0.75) 0.56 (0.34–0.91);
1.85 (0.76–4.51)
Carbone (2017) CheckMate 026 III NSCLC 1 Nivo vs. PBCh 423 63 [32–89]; 65 [29–87] ≥65: 65–74; ≥75 260 [48]: 198 [37]; 62 [11] 1.08 (0.87–1.34) 1.13 (0.83–1.54) 1.04 (0.77–1.41)
Herbst (2016) Keynote-010 II/III NSCLC >1 Pembro 2 mg/kg vs. Pembro 10 mg/kg vs. Docetaxel 1,034 63 [56–69]; 63 [56–69];
62 [56–69]
≥65 429 [41] 0.71 (0.58–0.88);
0.61 (0.49–0.75)
0.63 (0.50–0.79);
pooled-analysis
0.76 (0.57–1.02);
pooled-analysis
Reck (2019) Keynote-024 III NSCLC 1 Pembro vs. PBCh 305 64.5 [33–90]; 66.0 [28–85] ≥65 164 [54] 0.63 (0.47–0.86) 0.60 (0.38–0.96) 0.64 (0.42–0.98)
Mok (2019) Keynote-042 III NSCLC 1 Pembro vs. PBCh 1,274 63.0 [57–69]; 63.0 [57–69] ≥65 567 [44] TPS ≥50%: 0.69 (0.56–0.85); TPS ≥20%: 0.77 (0.64–0.92); TPS ≥1%: 0.81 (0.71–0.93) 0.81 (0.60–1.08);
0.84 (0.65–1.08);
0.81 (0.67–0.98)
0.58 (0.42–0.80);
0.71 (0.54–0.92);
0.82 (0.66–1.01)
Fehrenbacher (2018) OAK III NSCLC >1 Atezo vs. Docetaxel 1,225 63.0 [25–84]; 64.0 [34–85] ≥65 564 [46] 0.80 (0.70–0.92) 0.84 (0.70–1.01) 0.75 (0.61–0.91)
Spigel (2019) IMpower-110 III NSCLC 1 Atezo vs. PBCh 554 NA; NA TC3/IC3, ≥65: 65–74; ≥75 103 [50]: 80 [39]; 22 [11] TC3/IC3: 0.59 (0.40–0.89) TC3/IC3: 0.59 (0.34–1.04) TC3/IC3: 0.63 (0.34–1.19);
1.04 (0.19–5.70)
Planchard (2020) ARCTIC Study A III NSCLC >2 Durva vs. SoC 126 63.5 [35–79]; 62.0 [41–81] ≥65 56 [44] 0.63 (0.42–0.93) NA NA
Rizvi (2020) MYSTIC III NSCLC 1 Durva vs. Durva + Treme vs. PBCh TPS ≥25: 489 64.0 [32–84]; 65.0 [64–87]; 64.5 [35–85] ≥65 256 [52] 0.76 (0.56–1.02); 0.85 (0.61–1.17) 0.86 (0.60–1.24); NA 0.66 (0.45–0.95); NA

aNSCLC, advanced non-small cell lung cancer; N, number; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; Nivo, Nivolumab; PBCh, platinum-based chemotherapy; Pembro, Pembrolizumab; Atezo Atezolizumab; Durva, Durvalumab; SoC, standard of care; Treme, Tremelimumab; NA, not available; TPS, tumor proportion score.