Table 4.
Overall (n = 139) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Initial citation set size category | n (%) | Median (IQR) number of records for full text screening | Median (IQR) number of full text records reviewed per screener during full text screeninga |
< 1000 | 22 (15.8) | 40 (28, 58) | 40 (20, 58)20 (10, 29) |
1000–2500 | 27 (19.4) | 82 (44, 178) | 79 (44, 178)40 (22, 89) |
2500–5000 | 34 (24.5) | 98 (30, 222) | 74 (28, 163)37 (14, 81) |
5000–10,000 | 28 (20.1) | 118 (51, 194) | 107 (36, 158)53 (18, 79) |
> 10,000 | 28 (20.1) | 131 (72, 640) | 117 (53, 345)58 (26, 173) |
aFor most reviews, two screeners were assigned. When there were more than two screeners, not all screeners reviewed each citation