Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 12;28(3):329–351. doi: 10.1177/1553350621990480

Table 1.

Main Study Characteristics.

Study MI Ability Measurement N° Participants Population Type Interventions Duration of MP Session (minutes) × Total Amount of Sessions × Intervention Duration (days) Primary Outcome Measures Intervention Group Compared to Control
Abraham 2018 MIQ-RS, KVIQ-20 VMIQ-2 20 Parkinson’s disease MP vs control 120 min × 10 × 14 days TUGT, 6-min walk test, FGS, 30 sec chair stand, 360° turn test and PRT Improved
Asa 2014 No 36 Healthy MP only vs PP only vs control 25 min × 1 × 1 days Speed and accuracy of task performance No difference
Bathalon 2005 No 44 Healthy MI and KG vs KG alone vs control n/a × n/a × 14 days OSCE Improved
Bovend'Eerdt 2008 IST 11 Arm spasticity PP vs MP and PP vs control 1.5 min × 32 × 56 days Resistance to passive movement No difference
Braun 2011 VMIQ-2 47 Parkinson’s disease PP vs MP and PP vs control 20 min × 6 × 42 days Walking performance using visual analogue scale No difference
Braun 2012 No 36 Stroke patients PP vs MP and PP vs control n/a x 10 × 42 days Numeric rating scales No difference
Callow 2017 VMIQ-2 56 Healthy IVI vs IVI and KIN vs control 2 min × 1 × 1 days Time IVI and KIN improved
Cho 2013 No 28 Stroke patients MP vs control 15 min × 18 × 42 days FRT, TUGT, 10- m walk test and FMA Improved
Coker 2015 VMIQ-2 24 Healthy VI vs KIN vs control 60 min (MP+PP) × 1 × 1 day Hip movements recorded on motion capture system No difference
Conlin 2016 MIQ-R 12 Healthy MP vs control n/a × 1 × 1 days TSE and GE of mastoidectomy No difference
Cunha 2017 MIQ-RS 15 Transtibial amputees MP vs control 40 min × 12 × 28 days Ground reaction forces Improved
Dilek 2018 No 36 Distal radius fracture MP vs control 100 min × 1680 × 56 days Pain, wrist and forearm active ROM, grip strength, DASH questionnaire and MHQ Improved
Eldred-Evans 2013 No 64 Healthy VRS vs standard training and MP vs VRS training and MP vs control 30 min × 3 × 6 days Time, precision, accuracy and overall performance on BT and VRS MP groups improved
Frenkel 2014 No 18 Healthy MP vs control 15 min × 315 × 21 days ROM Improved
Geoffrion 2012 No 79 Healthy MP vs control n/a × 1 × 1 days GRS No difference
Gomes 2014 No 60 Healthy MP vs PP vs MP and then PP vs PP and then MP vs control .1 min × 24 × 1 days Time PP, MP and PP and PP and MP improved
Guillot 2009 Mental chronometry 14 Burn patients MP vs control n/a × 10 × 14 days Goniometric data Improved
Hemayattalab 2009 No 40 Intellectually disabled patients MP vs PP vs MP and then PP vs PP and then MP vs control 30 min × 24 × 24 days Free throw test PP improved most
Hidalgo-Perez 2015 No 40 Healthy MCTE and MI vs control 15 min × 20 × 30 days Craniocervical neuromotor control, joint position error and fatigue after effort Improved
Hosseini 2012 MMSE, VMIQ and VVIQ 30 Healthy OT and MP vs control 15 min × 15 × 35 days TUGT Improved
Hoyek 2014 MIQ-R 16 Shoulder impingement MP and PP vs control 15 min × 9 × 21 days Shoulder function, ROM and pain Improved
Ietswaart 2011 Task chronometry 121 Stroke patients MP and standard rehabilitation vs standard rehabilitation and non-motor mental rehearsal vs control 39 min × 20 × 28 days ARAT No difference
Immenroth 2007 No 98 Healthy MP and PP vs PP only vs control 60 min × 2 × 2 days OSATS No difference
Jungmann 2011 Mental chronometry 40 Healthy MP and VR training vs control 3 min × 4 × 4 days Time, tip trajectory and instrument collision No difference
Kim 2013 VMIQ-2 30 Stroke patients Standard therapy and AO vs standard therapy and MP vs control 20 min × 20 × 28 days TUGT, FRT, WAQ and FAC Improvement in AO group
Kim 2018 VMIQ 16 Stroke patients CMIT and MP vs control 10 min × 10 × 14 days Motor evoked potential amplitude, 3-D motion analysis, JT test and motor activity log No difference
Komesu 2009 No 68 Healthy MP vs control 20 min × 1 × 1 day GSOP No difference
Lebon 2011 No 12 Torn ACL patients Standard physiotherapy and MP vs control 15 min × 180 × 31 days Muscle activation Improved
Lim 2016 No 20 Healthy MP and PP vs and control 60 min × 1 × 1 day Technical achievement No difference
Liu 2004 No 46 Stroke patients MP and standard rehabilitation vs control 60 min × 15 × 21 days Performance on 15 tasks, FMA and CTT No difference
Liu 2009 No 34 Stroke patients MP and conventional therapy vs control 60 min × 15 × 21 days Performance on 15 tasks No difference
Liu 2009 No 35 Post-stroke patients MP and conventional therapy vs control 60 min × 15 × 21 days Evaluation of skills No difference
Losana-Ferrer 2018 MIQ 60 Healthy MP vs AO vs control 6 min × n/a × 10 days Hand grip strength, EMG and IM oxygenation Improved (not on IM oxygenation)
Louridas 2015 MIQ and MIQ-R 20 Healthy PP and MP vs control n/a × n/a × 7 days OSATS and bariatric OSATS No difference
Malouin 2009 KVIQ 12 Stroke patients MP and PP vs cognitive training and PP vs control n/a × 12 × 28 days Limb loading Improved
Maring 1990 No 26 Healthy MP and PP vs control n/a x 1 x 1 days Upper limb muscle activity Improved
Mendoza 1978 No 32 Healthy MP only vs MP with simulated movement vs PP only vs control 15 min × 6 × 6 days Success in dart throwing PP improved most
Millard 2001 No 60 Healthy MP vs PP vs MP and PP vs control 30 min × 3 × 3 days Wet exit attempts scored MP and PP improved most
Mulla 2012 No 41 Healthy BT vs BT and additional practice vs VRS training vs MP vs control 15 min × 7 × 7 days Assessed on BT and VRS on time, precision, accuracy and performance MP performed worst apart from control
Nicholson 2018 KVIQ 30 Healthy MP only vs PP only vs control 25 min × 1 × 1 day Gait speed, gait variability using GAITRite and timed up and go No difference
Nilsen 2012 VMIQ-2 19 Stroke patients PP and internal MP vs PP and external MP vs control 18 min × 12 × 42 days FM and JT test Improved
Oostra 2015 MIQ-RS 44 Stroke patients Standard rehabilitation and MP vs control 30 min × 30 × 42 days 10-m walk test and FM No difference
Page 2005 No 11 Stroke patients PP and MP vs PP only vs control 30 min x 12 × 42 days Motor activity log and ARAT Improved
Page 2007 No 32 Stroke patients MP and standard rehabilitation vs control 30 min × 12 × 42 days ARAT and FM Improved
Page 2009 No 10 Stroke patients mCIT and MP vs control 30 min × 30 × 70 days ARAT and FM Improved
Page, S. 2011 No 29 Stroke patients MP vs MP vs MP (different lengths) vs control 40 min × 30 × 70 days FM and ARAT Improved
Park 2015 VMIQ 30 Stroke patients MP and standard rehabilitation vs control 10 min x 20 × 28 days LBT and SCT Improved
Sanders 2004 No 65 Healthy 2 sessions PP and 1 MP vs 1 PP and 2 MP vs control 30 min × 3 × 21 days GRS No difference
Sanders 2008 Revised Minnesota test 64 Healthy MP vs control 30 min × 2 × 24 days Surgical behaviour Improved
Santiago 2015 MIQ-R 20 Parkinson’s disease MP and standard therapy vs control n/a × 1 × 1 day Gait analysis No difference
Schuster 2012 KVIQ 39 Stroke patients MP added to physio vs MP embedded into physio vs control 45 min × 6 × 14 days Time taken to perform skill No difference
Seebacher 2017 No 112 MS patients Music and MI vs metronome MI vs control 17 min × 24 × 28 days Walking speed Improved
Sharp 2014 No 18 Spinal cord injury patients MP with overground training vs control 30 min × 24 × 56 days Gait velocity No difference
Sidaway 2005 No 24 Healthy MP vs PP vs control 15 min × 12 × 28 days Isometric torque and percentage improvement No difference
Stenekes 2009 VMIQ 28 Post flexor tendon repair MP and conventional therapy vs control .6 min × 336 × 42 days Preparation time of finger flexion Improved
Timmermans 2013 VMIQ 42 Stroke patients Standard therapy and MP vs control 10 min × 126 × 42 days FM, FAT, WMFT and accelerometry No difference and improved on FAT
Vergeer 2006 VVIQ 47 Healthy MI vs SI vs control 30 min × 11 × 28 days Flexibility and comfort Improved in comfort and no difference in flexibility
Wilson 2002 No 54 Motor coordination problems MI vs PP vs control 60 min × 5 × 35 days MABC PP improved most
Wilson 2016 No 36 Motor coordination problems MI vs PP 60 min × 5 × 35 days MABC No difference