Table 2. Summary statistics of 136 Torenia accessions from 17 lines/populations evaluated with seven iPBS primers.
| Populations | N | Na | Ne | I | He | uHe | Polymorphic loci % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 8 | 0.7500 ± 0.0598 | 1.1101 ± 0.0223 | 0.0928 ± 0.0178 | 0.0629 ± 0.0123 | 0.0671 ± 0.0131 | 16.89% |
| B | 8 | 0.6757 ± 0.0518 | 1.0514 ± 0.0153 | 0.0458 ± 0.0127 | 0.0305 ± 0.0087 | 0.0325 ± 0.0093 | 8.78% |
| C | 8 | 0.6351 ± 0.0481 | 1.0302 ± 0.0121 | 0.0269 ± 0.0099 | 0.0178 ± 0.0067 | 0.0190 ± 0.0072 | 5.41% |
| D | 8 | 0.6892 ± 0.0524 | 1.0567 ± 0.0168 | 0.0486 ± 0.0132 | 0.0325 ±0.0091 | 0.0346 ± 0.0097 | 9.46% |
| E | 8 | 0.7568 ± 0.0564 | 1.0894 ± 0.0202 | 0.0770 ± 0.0163 | 0.0518 ± 0.0112 | 0.0553 ± 0.0119 | 14.19% |
| F | 8 | 0.7365 ± 0.0609 | 1.1196 ± 0.0236 | 0.0990 ± 0.0184 | 0.0675 ± 0.0128 | 0.0720 ± 0.0136 | 17.57% |
| G | 8 | 0.7027 ± 0.0595 | 1.0973 ± 0.0208 | 0.0842 ± 0.0169 | 0.0566 ± 0.0116 | 0.0604 ± 0.0124 | 15.54% |
| H | 8 | 0.7365 ± 0.0609 | 1.1305 ±0.0248 | 0.1047 ± 0.0192 | 0.0723 ± 0.0134 | 0.0772 ± 0.0143 | 17.57% |
| I | 8 | 0.5338 ± 0.0493 | 1.0309 ± 0.0122 | 0.0274 ± 0.0100 | 0.0182 ± 0.0069 | 0.0194 ± 0.0073 | 5.41% |
| J | 8 | 0.4865 ± 0.0465 | 1.0243 ± 0.0112 | 0.0200 ± 0.0090 | 0.0138 ± 0.0062 | 0.0147 ± 0.0066 | 3.38% |
| K | 8 | 0.5473 ± 0.0528 | 1.0464 ± 0.0149 | 0.0409 ± 0.0121 | 0.0271 ± 0.0083 | 0.0290 ± 0.0088 | 8.11% |
| L | 8 | 0.6216 ± 0.0562 | 1.0600 ± 0.0164 | 0.0549 ± 0.0135 | 0.0360 ± 0.0092 | 0.0383 ± 0.0098 | 11.49% |
| M | 8 | 0.6081 ± 0.0611 | 1.1151 ± 0.0234 | 0.0934 ± 0.0182 | 0.0644 ± 0.0127 | 0.0686 ± 0.0135 | 15.54% |
| N | 8 | 0.4932 ± 0.0530 | 1.0609 ± 0.0186 | 0.0472 ± 0.0137 | 0.0327 ± 0.0097 | 0.0349 ± 0.0103 | 8.11% |
| P | 8 | 0.6284 ± 0.0616 | 1.1111 ± 0.0232 | 0.0908 ± 0.0178 | 0.0620 ± 0.0125 | 0.0662 ± 0.0133 | 16.22% |
| Q | 8 | 0.6014 ± 0.0619 | 1.1067 ± 0.0222 | 0.0900 ± 0.0175 | 0.0609 ± 0.0121 | 0.0650 ± 0.0129 | 16.22% |
| R | 8 | 0.9932 ± 0.0788 | 1.2885 ±0.0309 | 0.2453 ± 0.0239 | 0.1655 ± 0.0167 | 0.1766 ± 0.0178 | 45.27% |
| Mean | 8 | 0.6586 ± 0.0141 | 1.0899 ± 0.0050 | 0.0758 ± 0.0039 | 0.0513 ± 0.0027 | 0.0547 ± 0.0029 | 13.83% ± 2.28% |
Notes:
N, number of sample size; Na, number of different alleles; Ne, number of effective alleles = 1/(p ^ 2 + q ^ 2); I, Shannon’s information index = −1* (p * Ln (p) + q * Ln(q)); He, expected heterozygosity = 2 * p * q; uHe, unbiased expected heterozygosity = (2N/(2N − 1))* He. Where for diploid binary data and assuming Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium, q = (1 − Band Freq.) ^ 0.5 and p = 1 − q.
A, Duchess Pink; B, Duchess Burgundy; C, Duchess Deep Blue; D, Kauai Burgundy; E, Kauai Rose; F, Kauai Deep Blue; G, Kauai Blue and White; H, Kauai Magenta; I, Kauai Lemon Drop; J, Kauai White; K, Little Kiss White; L, Little Kiss Burgundy; M, Little Kiss Blue and White; N, Little Kiss Rose Picotee; P, Little Kiss Blue; Q, Lipu; R, Xichou.