Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 7;41(27):5833–5848. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1576-20.2021

Table 8.

Effects of 5-HT receptor activation on Shox2 in propertiesa

Uninjured
SCI
Uninjured vs SCI
mean ± SD test p mean ± SD test p test p
5-HT7 receptor activation Em, Δ from antagonist 3.6 ± 3 t(7) = 3.2 0.01* 3.5 ± 4 t(11) = 2.9 0.01* t(18) = 0.02 0.9
Rheobase current (% of antagonist) 87.0 ± 25 t(7) = 1.4 0.1 77.8 ± 20 t(12) = 3.9 0.001* t(19) = 0.9 0.3
Firing frequency at 1.5× rheobase (% of antagonist) 119.2 ± 44 W = 9 0.4 101.1 ± 39 W = −5 0.9 U = 24 0.3
5-HT2A receptor activation Em, Δ from antagonist 0.6 ± 3 W = −2 0.9 0.4 ± 2 t(9) = 0.5 0.6 U = 33 0.5
Rheobase current (% of antagonist) 98.4 ± 29 t(7) = 0.1 0.8 91.4 ± 26 W = −14 0.2 U = 33.5 0.5
Firing frequency at 1.5× rheobase (% of antagonist) 125.6 ± 57 W = −14 0.4 91.0 ± 24 t(9) = 1.1 0.2 U = 16.5 0.3
5-HT2B/2C receptor activation Em, Δ from antagonist −0.1 ± 1 t(6) = 0.2 0.8 3.1 ± 3 t(8) = 2.6 0.02* t(14) = 2.3 0.03*
Rheobase current (% of antagonist) 92.1 ± 19 t(6) = 1.0 0.3 73.2 ± 17 t(8) = 4.1 0.003* t(14) = 1.7 0.1
Firing frequency at 1.5× rheobase (% of antagonist) 99.3 ± 9 W = −1 0.9 106.9 ± 22 t(7) = 0.8 0.4 U = 20 0.6

aUninjured and SCI, one-sample t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test (W); Uninjured versus SCI, unpaired t test or Mann–Whitney U test.

*Statistical significance: p < 0.05.