Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 8;13(6):e15531. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15531

Table 3. Studies highlighting the use of artificial intelligence in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

ANN - Artificial Neuronal Network; ARDS - Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; CR - Clinical Recognition; EHR - Electronic Health Records; ML - Machine Learning, n - Number of Subjects, SAP - Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Author Year Study type (n) Aim Main Conclusion
You J.Y. et al. [16] 2020 Retrospective (n=1,305) Compare rate and time of recognition of ARDS by ML with bedside  CR ML algorithm identified more cases of ARDS as compared to CR. No difference in the rate of identification
Le S. et al. [17] 2020 Retrospective (n=9,919) Develop a model trained on patient data of health record to predict ARDS Supervised ML can predict ARDS up to 48 hours before its actual onset
Sinha P. et al. [18] 2020 Retrospective (n=2,022 in training vs n=745 validation data) Classify ARDS phenotypes by models trained on a clinical data set ML models can accurately identify ARDS phenotypes
Zeiberg D. et al. [19] 2019 Retrospective (n=1,621 in training vs n=1,122 in test cohort) Develop an ML approach to predict ARDS based on EHR It is feasible to use the ML approach to risk-stratify patients for ARDS based on EHR
Fei Y. et al. [20] 2019 Retrospective(n=217) Use ANN to predict and determine the severity of ARDS in SAP patients Novel ANN can be used to predict ARDS in SAP