Table 3. Studies highlighting the use of artificial intelligence in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
ANN - Artificial Neuronal Network; ARDS - Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; CR - Clinical Recognition; EHR - Electronic Health Records; ML - Machine Learning, n - Number of Subjects, SAP - Severe Acute Pancreatitis
| Author | Year | Study type (n) | Aim | Main Conclusion |
| You J.Y. et al. [16] | 2020 | Retrospective (n=1,305) | Compare rate and time of recognition of ARDS by ML with bedside CR | ML algorithm identified more cases of ARDS as compared to CR. No difference in the rate of identification |
| Le S. et al. [17] | 2020 | Retrospective (n=9,919) | Develop a model trained on patient data of health record to predict ARDS | Supervised ML can predict ARDS up to 48 hours before its actual onset |
| Sinha P. et al. [18] | 2020 | Retrospective (n=2,022 in training vs n=745 validation data) | Classify ARDS phenotypes by models trained on a clinical data set | ML models can accurately identify ARDS phenotypes |
| Zeiberg D. et al. [19] | 2019 | Retrospective (n=1,621 in training vs n=1,122 in test cohort) | Develop an ML approach to predict ARDS based on EHR | It is feasible to use the ML approach to risk-stratify patients for ARDS based on EHR |
| Fei Y. et al. [20] | 2019 | Retrospective(n=217) | Use ANN to predict and determine the severity of ARDS in SAP patients | Novel ANN can be used to predict ARDS in SAP |