Author |
Year |
Study type (n) |
Aim |
Main Conclusion |
You J.Y. et al. [16] |
2020 |
Retrospective (n=1,305) |
Compare rate and time of recognition of ARDS by ML with bedside CR |
ML algorithm identified more cases of ARDS as compared to CR. No difference in the rate of identification |
Le S. et al. [17] |
2020 |
Retrospective (n=9,919) |
Develop a model trained on patient data of health record to predict ARDS |
Supervised ML can predict ARDS up to 48 hours before its actual onset |
Sinha P. et al. [18] |
2020 |
Retrospective (n=2,022 in training vs n=745 validation data) |
Classify ARDS phenotypes by models trained on a clinical data set |
ML models can accurately identify ARDS phenotypes |
Zeiberg D. et al. [19] |
2019 |
Retrospective (n=1,621 in training vs n=1,122 in test cohort) |
Develop an ML approach to predict ARDS based on EHR |
It is feasible to use the ML approach to risk-stratify patients for ARDS based on EHR |
Fei Y. et al. [20] |
2019 |
Retrospective(n=217) |
Use ANN to predict and determine the severity of ARDS in SAP patients |
Novel ANN can be used to predict ARDS in SAP |