Table 3.

Regression coefficients, standard errors, and summary information for the hypothesized model.

		Consequent
		M1 Threat				M2 Efficacy				M3 Suppression				M4 Denial				M5 Reappraisal				Y Intention
Antecedent		Coeff.	SE	p		Coeff.	SE	p		Coeff.	SE	p		Coeff.	SE	p		Coeff.	SE	p		Coeff.	SE	p
X1 Condition Threat-only (−0.5) Threat-coping (+0.5)	a1	.11	.16	.49	a2	.11	.18	.52	a3	.03	.18	.85	a4	−.06	.17	.75	a5	−.10	.18	.57	c’	.18	.15	.24
X2 Condition Threat-coping (−0.5) Coping-threat (+0.5)	a1	.06	.16	.70	a2	−.07	.17	.70	a3	−.12	.18	.48	a4	−.05	.17	.76	a5	−.10	.18	.58	c’	.07	.15	.62
W Personal risk	d1	.47	.06	<.001	d4	−.19	.06	.004	d7	−.01	.07	.93	d12	−.01	.07	.89	d17	.00	.08	.95	b1	.00	.06	.97
Int1 Personal risk * X1	d2	−.14	.16	.39	d5	.20	.17	.24	d8	−.22	.18	.23	d13	−.04	.17	.82	d18	−.15	.18	.41	b2	.00	.15	.98
Int2 Personal risk * X2	d3	−.23	.16	.15	d6	.12	.18	.49	d9	−.08	.18	.67	d14	.16	.17	.37	d19	−.09	.18	.63	b3	−.15	.15	.32
M1 Perceived threat		–	–	–		–	–	–	d10	−.08	.07	.30	d15	.02	.07	.75	d20	.08	.08	.30	b4	.03	.06	.66
M2 Perceived efficacy		–	–	–		–	–	–	d11	−.32	.07	<.001	d16	.14	.07	.036	d21	−.19	.07	.008	b5	.15	.06	.014
M3 Suppression		–	–	–		–	–	–		–	–	–		–	–	–		–	–	–	b6	−.42	.06	<.001
M4 Denial		–	–	–		–	–	–		–	–	–		–	–	–		–	–	–	b7	.03	.06	.63
M5 Reappraisal		–	–	–		–	–	–		–	–	–		–	–	–		–	–	–	b8	−.09	.06	.11
		R2 = .489 F(5, 224) = 14.052, p < .001				R2 = .221 F(5, 224) = 2.298, p = .046				R2 = .325 F(7, 222) = 3.743, p < .001				R2 = .163 F(7, 222) = 0.862, p = .537				R2 = .048 F(7, 222) = 1.609, p = .134				R2 = .317 F(10, 219) = 10.183, p < .001

Note: Effects significant at <.05 are shown in bold.