Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 8;37(4):761–768. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06946-8

Table 1.

Patient and Support Person Baseline Characteristics

Intervention, N=123 dyads Control, N=116 dyads
Patients
Age, median6 62 (12) 64 (16.5)
Sex = female, n (%) 6 (4.9%) 2 (1.7%)
White non-Latino(a), n (%) 88 (72.1%) 91 (79.1%)
College completed, n (%) 29 (23.6%) 27 (23.3%)
HbA1c, mean6 8.4 (1.5) 8.6 (1.8)
Use insulin, n (%) 78 (63.4%) 64 (55.2%)
Support persons
Relationship to patient
Spouse/partner of patient, n (%) 75 (61.0%) 70 (60.3%)
Friend 25 (20.33) 16 (13.79%)
Adult child 9 (7.32%) 18 (15.52%)
Other relative 14 (11.38%) 12 (10.34%)
Cohabitation with patient, n (%) 86 (69.9%) 82 (70.7%)
Sex = female, n (%) 109 (88.6%) 106 (91.4%)
White non-Latino(a), n (%) 100 (94.3%) 92 (94.8%)
College completed, n (%) 25 (20.3%) 30 (25.9%)
Diagnosis of diabetes, n (%) 22 (18.2%) 24 (20.7%)
Support person caregiving experience
Distress about patient diabetes (adapted PAID-5), mean6; scale range 0–20; higher scores indicate more distress 6.0 (4.7) 6.7 (5.1)
Self-efficacy for caring for patient’s diabetes (Stanford), mean6; scale range 0–10; higher scores indicate more self-efficacy 7.6 (1.8) 7.5 (1.6)
Caregiver strain (CSI), mean6, scale range 0–26; higher scores indicate more strain 3.6 (3.7) 4.7 (4.4)
Satisfaction with VA support for caregivers as reported by support persons, mean6, scale range 1–10; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction 6.9 (2.9) 6.7 (3.2)