Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;2021:9995342. doi: 10.1155/2021/9995342

Table 2.

Biometric and echocardiographic parameters of mice in each group.

Parameter Sham (n = 5) Wog (n = 5) TAC (n = 5) TAC + Wog (n = 5)
IVSd (mm) 0.727 ± 0.078 0.748 ± 0.054 0.913 ± 0.083 0.772 ± 0.041#
IVSs (mm) 1.045 ± 0.147 1.069 ± 0.051 1.336 ± 0.05∗∗ 1.101 ± 0.084##
LVPWd (mm) 0.734 ± 0.065 0.707 ± 0.052 0.840 ± 0.04 0.733 ± 0.032##
LVPWs (mm) 1.069 ± 0.048 1.083 ± 0.120 1.222 ± 0.098 1.056 ± 0.103#
LVIDd (mm) 3.087 ± 0.165 3.071 ± 0.101 4.289 ± 0.256∗∗∗ 3.328 ± 0.142###
LVIDs (mm) 1.878 ± 0.181 1.902 ± 0.222 3.307 ± 0.184∗∗∗ 2.438 ± 0.111###

Interventricular septal dimension in diastole (IVSd), interventricular septal dimension in systole (IVSs), left ventricle end-diastolic posterior wall thickness (LVPWd), left ventricle systolic posterior wall thickness (LVPWs), left ventricular internal diameter end diastole (LVIDd), left ventricular internal diameter end systole (LVIDs). Values shown as mean ± SEM. P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 compared with sham; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001 compared with TAC. P values by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test are indicated.