Table 2.
Parameter | Sham (n = 5) | Wog (n = 5) | TAC (n = 5) | TAC + Wog (n = 5) |
---|---|---|---|---|
IVSd (mm) | 0.727 ± 0.078 | 0.748 ± 0.054 | 0.913 ± 0.083∗ | 0.772 ± 0.041# |
IVSs (mm) | 1.045 ± 0.147 | 1.069 ± 0.051 | 1.336 ± 0.05∗∗ | 1.101 ± 0.084## |
LVPWd (mm) | 0.734 ± 0.065 | 0.707 ± 0.052 | 0.840 ± 0.04∗ | 0.733 ± 0.032## |
LVPWs (mm) | 1.069 ± 0.048 | 1.083 ± 0.120 | 1.222 ± 0.098∗ | 1.056 ± 0.103# |
LVIDd (mm) | 3.087 ± 0.165 | 3.071 ± 0.101 | 4.289 ± 0.256∗∗∗ | 3.328 ± 0.142### |
LVIDs (mm) | 1.878 ± 0.181 | 1.902 ± 0.222 | 3.307 ± 0.184∗∗∗ | 2.438 ± 0.111### |
Interventricular septal dimension in diastole (IVSd), interventricular septal dimension in systole (IVSs), left ventricle end-diastolic posterior wall thickness (LVPWd), left ventricle systolic posterior wall thickness (LVPWs), left ventricular internal diameter end diastole (LVIDd), left ventricular internal diameter end systole (LVIDs). Values shown as mean ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 compared with sham; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001 compared with TAC. P values by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test are indicated.