Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 31;56(4):841–852. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-01101-z

Table 2.

Multivariate cox regression analysis for (a) OS and PFS and (b) RR and NRM.

HR [95%-CI] p value
(A) OS and PFS
Remission at allo-SCT

No remission vs.

CR MRD nega

OS 3.92 2.54–6.07 <0.0001
PFS 3.73 2.44–5.70 <0.0001

CR MRD pos vs.

CR MRD nega

OS 1.18 0.70–2.00 0.531
PFS 1.18 0.71–1.96 0.527
Conditioning TBI vs. no TBI OS 0.47 0.29–0.75 0.002
PFS 0.47 0.29–0.75 0.002
Patients´ age ≥55 vs. < 55 years OS 0.92 0.49–1.70 0.783
PFS 0.84 0.46–1.54 0.571
Phenotype T-ALL vs. B-ALL Ph neg OS 0.85 0.53–1.37 0.505
PFS 0.87 0.54–1.38 0.544

B-ALL Ph pos vs.

B-ALL Ph neg

OS 0.75 0.48–1.18 0.213
PFS 0.71 0.46–1.10 0.128
Timepoint of allo-SCT 1995–2000 vs. 2011–2018 OS 2.28 1.24–4.18 0.008
PFS 1.89 1.05–3.39 0.033
2001–2010 vs. 2011–2018 OS 1.62 0.90–2.93 0.111
PFS 1.50 0.85–2.66 0.163
(B) RR and NRM
Remission at allo-SCT

No remission vs.

CR MRD nega

RR 4.02 2.38–6.80 <0.0001
NRM 0.95 0.47–1.91 0.881

CR MRD pos vs.

CR MRD nega

RR 1.66 0.82–3.32 0.157
NRM 0.76 0.36–1.63 0.486
Conditioning TBI vs. no TBI RR 0.68 0.36–1.27 0.225
NRM 0.61 0.29–1.28 0.193
Patients´ age ≥55 vs. < 55 years RR 0.58 0.24–1.43 0.238
NRM 1.42 0.59–3.42 0.431
Phenotype T-ALL vs. B-ALL Ph neg RR 1.42 0.82–2.46 0.206
NRM 0.48 0.20–1.18 0.112

B-ALL Ph pos vs.

B-ALL Ph neg

RR 0.55 0.30–1.03 0.061
NRM 1.32 0.71–2.43 0.377
Timepoint of allo-SCT 1995–2000 vs. 2011–2018 RR 1.41 0.63–3.15 0.400
NRM 2.56 0.95–6.92 0.063
2001–2010 vs. 2011–2018 RR 1.91 0.87–4.22 0.108
NRM 1.40 0.56–3.48 0.468

HR Hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, OS overall survival, PFS progression free survival, CR complete remission, MRD minimal residual disease, neg negative, pos positive, TBI total body irradiation, Ph Philadelphia chromosome, allo-SCT allogeneic stem cell transplantation, RR cumulative incidence of relapse, NRM cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality.

aAnalysis of Ig-/TR-gene rearrangements via RQ-PCR or surface marker analysis by flow cytometry.