Table 5.
VR (SD) | PACS (SD) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
FV subgroup | |||
Appearance of anatomical structures | 4.6 (0.5) | 3.4 (0.5) | 0.034* |
Appearance of tools | 3.2 (0.4) | 3.2 (0.7) | 1.000 |
Usability of tools | 3.0 (0.6) | 3.0 (1.1) | 1.000 |
Performance of tools | 3.8 (0.4) | 3.4 (0.5) | 0.157 |
Haptic feedback | 3.6 (0.5) | 3.0 (0.6) | 0.830 |
Ergonomics | 3.2 (0.4) | 3.6 (1.0) | 0.317 |
Depth perception | 4.4 (0.8) | 2.0 (0.9) | 0.034* |
Quality of graphics | 4.4 (0.8) | 4.0 (0.9) | 0.317 |
CV subgroup | |||
Learning of anatomy | 4.6 (0.5) | 3.2 (0.4) | 0.059 |
Learning of surgical planning | 4.6 (0.5) | 3.4 (0.5) | 0.063 |
Understanding of anatomical structures | 4.4 (0.5) | 3.4 (0.5) | 0.034* |
Quality of measuring anatomical structures | 4.4 (0.5) | 2.8 (0.7) | 0.059 |
Understanding the relationships of anatomical structures | 4.6 (0.5) | 3.0 (0.6) | 0.180 |
Accuracy of measurement tool | 4.0 (0.9) | 3.6 (0.8) | 0.577 |
Hand-eye-coordination | 3.8 (0.4) | 3.0 (0.0) | 0.046* |
Overall score for surgical planning | 4.2 (0.4) | 3.4 (0.5) | 0.102 |
GR subgroup | |||
Recommend to colleague | 4.6 (0.5) | 4.2 (0.7) | 0.157 |
User-friendly | 3.6 (0.8) | 3.6 (1.0) | 1.000 |
Inclusion to surgical planning | 4.6 (0.5) | 4.8 (0.4) | 0.317 |
Understanding of the surgical site | 4.6 (0.5) | 3.8 (0.4) | 0.046* |
Subjects (n = 5)
VR virtual reality environment, PACS conventional cross-sectional (2D) method. FV Face validation, CV Content validation, GR Global rating, SD standard deviation
*Statistically significant difference between the methods