Skip to main content
. 2021 May 13;10(13):4615–4628. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3965

TABLE 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses in the training set

Variable Category Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95%CI) p value HR (95%CI) p value
Age Continuous 1.03 (1.00–1.04) 0.027 1.03 (1.01–1.05) 0.006
Gender Female vs. Male 0.89 (0.54–1.44) 0.625
Tumor site Oral cavity vs. Larynx 1.13 (0.67–1.90) 0.660
Oral cavity vs. Pharynx 1.19 (0.56–2.55) 0.649
TNM stage Ⅰ vs. Ⅱ 2.12 (0.75–6.01) 0.158 2.05 (0.72–5.82) 0.178
Ⅰ vs. Ⅲ 2.39 (0.85–6.75) 0.099 2.30 (0.82–6.59) 0.116
Ⅰ vs. Ⅳ 3.60 (1.33–9.72) 0.011 2.38 (1.15–5.13) 0.026
Tumor grade G1 vs. G2 1.79 (0.93–3.44) 0.082 2.23 (0.99–5.00) 0.052
G1 vs. G3 1.34 (0.65–2.77) 0.434 1.69 (0.71–4.06) 0.239
Transcriptional subtype Classical vs. Atypical 0.55 (0.29–1.02) 0.058 1.05 (0.54–2.01) 0.896
Classical vs. Basal 0.61 (0.34–1.08) 0.087 1.07 (0.58–1.98) 0.832
Classical vs. Mesenchymal 0.67 (0.38–1.18) 0.162 1.30 (0.72–2.36) 0.391
HTRS Low‐risk vs. High‐risk 4.09 (2.34–7.15) <0.001 5.17 (2.82–9.41) <0.001

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; HTRS, histopathological transcriptomics risk score.