Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 22;13(13):3118. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133118

Table 6.

Results from Adjusted Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Models of Impact of the Presence of ctDNA Mutations on Overall Survival.

6-Gene Analysis 3-Gene Analysis 2-Gene Analysis
HR 95% CI p Value HR 95% CI p Value HR 95% CI p Value
ctDNA
mutations
1.62 (0.99–2.65) 0.053 1.85 (1.10–3.12) 0.020 1.87 (1.02–3.43) 0.042
p value for Adjusted Variables p value for Adjusted Variables p value for Adjusted Variables
Age Below 60 Years Old
(yes vs. no)
0.65 0.70 0.64
Smoking
(never vs. ever)
0.41 0.54 0.55
N Stage (N0 vs N1, N2, N3) 0.33 0.49 0.31
Subsite
(OP vs. OC,
Pharynx, Other)
0.02 0.02 0.04
CRT Prior to ctDNA Test
(yes vs. no)
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Analyses with p < 0.05 are bolded in italics and underlined; results with 0.05 < p < 0.10 are italicized and underlined. Abbreviations: CI, Confidence interval; ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; HR, hazard ratio; CI, hazard ratio confidence interval; CS, chi-squared analysis; N/A, non-applicable; CRT, combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy; OC, oral cavity; OP, oropharynx.