TABLE 5.
Results of multiple hierarchical regression analysis investigating whether the AF tracts in the left hemisphere (according to the modified Catani model) are related to language scores beyond damage to specific frontal, temporal, and parietal cortical language areas.
Model | Fluency | Information content | Repetition | Naming | Comprehension | WAB AQ | BNT | CYCLE Simple | CYCLE Word Order | CYCLE Complex | ||||||||||
Adj. | Sig. | Adj. | Sig. | Adj. | Sig. | Adj. | Sig. | Adj. | Sig. | Adj. | Sig. | Adj. | Sig. | Adj. | Sig. | Adj. | Sig. | Adj. | Sig. | |
R2 | F Change | R2 | F Change | R2 | F Change | R2 | F Change | R2 | F Change | R2 | F Change | R2 | F Change | R2 | F Change | R2 | F Change | R2 | F Change | |
Step 1 – Specific cortical areas (temporal, frontal, parietal regions), gender and time post-onset | 0.319 | 0.011 | 0.220 | 0.045 | 0.574 | <0.001 | 0.445 | 0.001 | 0.407 | 0.002 | 0.509 | <0.001 | 0.357 | 0.006 | 0.304 | 0.013 | 0.299 | 0.015 | 0.301 | 0.014 |
Step 2a – Tract normalized volume | - | n.s. | - | n.s. | - | n.s. | - | n.s. | - | n.s. | - | n.s. | 0.468 | 0.02 | - | n.s. | - | n.s. | - | n.s. |
Significant predictors | - | - | - | - | - | - | AF long | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Step 2b – Tract HMOA | 0.461 | 0.011 | - | n.s. | - | n.s. | 0.663 | 0.008 | 0.480 | 0.044 | 0.635 | 0.028 | 0.582 | 0.005 | - | n.s. | - | n.s. | 0.388 | 0.043 |
Significant predictors | AF anterior | - | - | AF anterior, AF posterior | AF posterior | AF anterior, AF posterior | AF anterior AF posterior | - | - | AF posterior |
n.s., not significant.