Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 25;15:672665. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.672665

TABLE 5.

Results of multiple hierarchical regression analysis investigating whether the AF tracts in the left hemisphere (according to the modified Catani model) are related to language scores beyond damage to specific frontal, temporal, and parietal cortical language areas.

Model Fluency Information content Repetition Naming Comprehension WAB AQ BNT CYCLE Simple CYCLE Word Order CYCLE Complex










Adj. Sig. Adj. Sig. Adj. Sig. Adj. Sig. Adj. Sig. Adj. Sig. Adj. Sig. Adj. Sig. Adj. Sig. Adj. Sig.
R2 F Change R2 F Change R2 F Change R2 F Change R2 F Change R2 F Change R2 F Change R2 F Change R2 F Change R2 F Change
Step 1 – Specific cortical areas (temporal, frontal, parietal regions), gender and time post-onset 0.319 0.011 0.220 0.045 0.574 <0.001 0.445 0.001 0.407 0.002 0.509 <0.001 0.357 0.006 0.304 0.013 0.299 0.015 0.301 0.014
Step 2a – Tract normalized volume - n.s. - n.s. - n.s. - n.s. - n.s. - n.s. 0.468 0.02 - n.s. - n.s. - n.s.
Significant predictors - - - - - - AF long - - -
Step 2b – Tract HMOA 0.461 0.011 - n.s. - n.s. 0.663 0.008 0.480 0.044 0.635 0.028 0.582 0.005 - n.s. - n.s. 0.388 0.043
Significant predictors AF anterior - - AF anterior, AF posterior AF posterior AF anterior, AF posterior AF anterior AF posterior - - AF posterior

n.s., not significant.