Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;10(13):2939. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132939

Table 6.

Association between DSS score, therapy delay and outcome between control + RRT vs. CytoSorb group. Please note that groups containing not enough patients for a reliable statistical evaluation were classified as not applicable (n.a.); therefore, no analysis was performed in these groups. Presented are frequency and percentage (%) and levels of significance.

ICU Mortality Hospital Mortality
Control + RRT Group (n = 69) CytoSorb Group (n = 198) p-Value Control + RRT Group (n = 69) CytoSorb Group (n = 198) p-Value
DSS <6 points, CytoSorb delay ≤12 h n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
DSS 6–8 points, CytoSorb delay ≤12 h 27 (58.7%) 21 (47.7%) 0.303 30 (65.2%) 21 (47.7%) 0.096
DSS >8 points, CytoSorb delay ≤12 h 12 (92.3%) 17 (51.5%) 0.009 * 12 (92.3%) 21 (63.6%) 0.053
DSS <6 points, CytoSorb delay >12–24 h n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
DSS 6–8 points, CytoSorb delay >12–24 h 27 (58.7%) 25 (54.3%) 0.678 30 (65.2%) 26 (56.5%) 0.398
DSS >8 points, CytoSorb delay >12–24 h n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
DSS <6 points, CytoSorb delay >24 h n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
DSS 6–8 points, CytoSorb delay >24 h 27 (58.7%) 19 (70.3%) 0.318 30 (65.2%) 19 (70.3%) 0.654
DSS >8 points, CytoSorb delay >24 h n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

* = Statistically significant using Bonferroni-adjusted alpha critical value = 0.017.