Table 3.
Series | N° Cases |
Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Diagnostic Accuracy |
ROM (Ranged According to the Cytologic Categories) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shayganfar [25] | 239 | 91.7% | 52.8% | / | / | / | 0−25% |
Barbosa [26] | 140 | 95.3% | 84.6% | 87% | 94% | 90.2% | 20−92.9% |
Zhang [27] | 319 | 86.7% | 91.4% | 75.6% | 95.3% | 96% | 0−90.5% |
Maia [28] | 242 | 80% | 84% | 71% | 90% | 66.7% | 8.7%−77% |
Rocha [29] | 143 | 80.4% | 94% | 52.4% | 95% | / | 0−72% |
Chaigeau [30] | 602 | 95%% | / | 77.6% | 55% | / | 20−100% |
Rahal [32] | 1000 | / | / | / | / | / | 16−92% |
Grani [33] | 502 | 83.3% | 56.2% | 12.8% | 97.8% | / | 2−20% |
Wu [39] | 346 | 96% | 53% | 76% | 89% | 79% |
PPV: positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value; ROM = risk of malignancy