Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 26;22(13):6886. doi: 10.3390/ijms22136886

Table 1.

A summary of the functional rivalry between CB1 and CB2 receptors in myocardial injuries.

Category CB1 Function CB2 Function References
Myocardial infarction CB1 aggravated cardiac ischemic injuries CB2 mitigated cardiac ischemic injuries [20,23,26,27,28]
Cardiac I/R injury Majority of the literature documents CB1 as a mediator of I/R injury, although there is some controversy across studies CB2 potently protected from I/R injury [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]
Pathological cardiac hypertrophy Majority of the literature documents CB1 as a pro-hypertrophic receptor, and CB1 tended to be not as potent as CB2 in controlling hypertrophy CB2 potently conferred anti-hypertrophic property [38,39,40]
Cardiac fibrosis CB1 promoted fibrogenesis mainly through TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway CB2 ameliorated cardiac fibrosis via TGFβ1-dependent and independent manners [23,27,29,30,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]
Antipsychotics cardiotoxicity Pharmacological inhibition of CB1 was cardioprotective Pharmacological activation of CB2 was cardioprotective [47,48,49,50]
Anti-tumor drug cardiotoxicity Genetic ablation or pharmacological antagonism of CB1 was cardioprotective Unknown [51,52]
Ethanol-induced myocardial injury Less known CB2 attenuated ethanol toxicity [53,54]