Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 9;14:359. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04861-9

Table 3.

Fst pairwise comparisons among 15 Trichinella spiralis larval cohorts

Isolate code F1a F1b F1c F1d F2 WB1 WB2 WB3 WB4 WB5 WB6 WB7 WB8 WB9
F1b −0.006
F1c 0.041 0.099
F1d 0.050 0.020 0.197
F2 0.060 0.028 0.207 0.000
WB1 0.462 0.503 0.385 0.422 0.442
WB2 0.604 0.700 0.452 0.762 0.785 0.045
WB3 0.626 0.665 0.548 0.629 0.645 0.047 0.107
WB4 0.549 0.582 0.492 0.544 0.557 0.391 0.474 0.549
WB5 0.907 0.932 0.879 0.952 0.957 0.518 0.838 0.688 0.695
WB6 0.081 0.164 –0.005 0.235 0.261 0.249 0.296 0.450 0.390 0.843
WB7 0.753 0.788 0.716 0.730 0.747 0.303 0.506 0.383 0.673 0.776 0.624
WB8 0.420 0.486 0.337 0.407 0.434 0.102 0.164 0.206 0.436 0.718 0.202 0.308
WB9 0.681 0.764 0.557 0.819 0.840 0.135 0.124 0.307 0.310 0.812 0.374 0.631 0.271
WB10 0.727 0.821 0.588 1.000 1.000 0.178 0.076 0.310 0.525 0.934 0.489 0.720 0.354 0.237

F1a-d isolates collected from outbreak 1, F2 from outbreak 2 and WB1-15 from hunted wild boars. Comparisons in bold are not significantly different from null hypothesis (nominal P level set to 0.05)