Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 25;22(13):6839. doi: 10.3390/ijms22136839

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Immunohistochemical staining of rat cerebellum by caspase 3. (A) negative control group. (B) vehicle group. (C) D-gal group revealing strong caspase 3 reaction in Purkinje cells layer (PCL), in granular cells layer (GL) and in molecular cells layer (ML). (D) D-gal+TQ group. (E) D-gal+Cur group. (F) D-gal+TQ+Cur group. (G) Quantification of caspase 3 in the cerebellum in different groups. Scale bar = 50 µm. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *** p < 0.001 vs. control. ++ p < 0.01 and +++ p < 0.001 vs. vehicle. xxx p < 0.001 vs. D-gal. ɸɸɸ p < 0.001 vs. D-gal+TQ. ### p < 0.001 vs. D-gal+TQ+Cur. Error bars represent mean ± SD. n = 10.