Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2020;324(1):10.1007/s10967-020-07075-y. doi: 10.1007/s10967-020-07075-y

Table 7.

Uncertainty budget summarizing the significant components contributing to the combined standard uncertainty (RComb) for characterized plutonium isotope amount ratios of the 244Pu Spike

Uncertainty component Description Assessment type Relative standard uncertainty (%) of contributing components
n(239Pu)/n(244Pu) n(240Pu)/n(244Pu) n(241Pu)/n(244Pu) n(242Pu)/n(244Pu)
RVarW Standard uncertainty of within-laboratory measurement variability A 0.30 0.15 1.04 0.16
RVarB Standard uncertainty of between-laboratory measurement variability A 1.3 0.47 10.3 0.46
RCRM Average standard uncertainty derived from certificate values for mass spectrometry calibration CRMs B 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
RCorr Estimated standard uncertainty of mass spectrometry measurements B 0.28 0.09 1.07 0.15
δDecay Standard uncertainty associated with decay corrections for measured values B 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00
RComb Relative combined standard uncertainty (%) k = 1 1.5 0.53 10.4 0.51

The relative combined standard uncertainty (bold) is calculated from the listed uncertainty components summed in quadrature Assessment Type “A” denotes evaluation by statistical methods; “B” denotes evaluation by other methods