Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 24;13(13):3166. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133166

Table 5.

Dworak response grade prediction analysis. Clinical, biological, and genetic predictors filtering was based on the results of five algorithms which measure the contribution to prediction on the grade of tumor regression (Dworak grade) after RCT was administrated prior to surgery (CEA serum levels, lymph node involvement, and alterations on 4q, 15q11.1, 15q14, and 17q21.31 chromosomal regions).

Algorithm Parameters Filtering Method Nº of Variables Hit Rate (%)
G0/G1 G2 G3/G4 Global
PLS Number of factors: 3 No 7 40 100 67 60
PLS Number of factors: 2 Yes 4 80 0 0 40
wSVM Kernel: Sigmoid; gamma: 8; cost: 100 No 7 80 50 33 60
wSVM Kernel: polynomial; gamma: 0.25; cost: 100 Yes 4 0 0 67 20
SVM Kernel: Sigmoid; gamma: 0.25; cost: 0.001 No 7 100 0 0 50
SVM Kernel: polynomial; gamma: 0.25; cost: 0.001 Yes 4 100 0 0 50
KNN k neighbors: 23 No 7 100 0 0 50
KNN k neighbors: 23 Yes 4 100 0 0 50
Random Forest Number of trees: 2 No 7 40 100 67 60
Random Forest Number of trees: 2 Yes 4 60 0 33 40

PLS: Partial Least Squares algorithms (SIMFIT software v.6.9.9; www.simfit.org.uk); SVM: Support Vector Machines; KNM: K-Nearest Neighbors; GO/G1: Non-responders; G2: Partial responders; G3/G4: Responders. *we include the 3 or 6 best ranked by the prediction of the analyzed algorithms (N2, chr4q loss, chr15q11.1gain, chr15q14 loss, 17q21.31 gain, N1 and CEA). The best models found to predict the response to the RCT administrated prior to surgery are shown in bold.