Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;10(13):2946. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132946

Table 2.

Comparative analysis of all measured variables for the EG and the CG at the initial assessment.

Parameter Group Med IQR Min Max Sk. Z p r
EPIC-26 (overall urinary difficulties) CG 2 2.5 1 5 0.64 −0.14 1 0.02
EG 2 3 1 5 0.4
EPIC-26 (incontinence subscale) CG 9 0 7 10 −1.24 −0.14 1 0.02
EG 9 0 6 10 −2.05
EPIC-26 (irritation/ obstruction subscale) CG 4 4 0 9 0.38 0.6 1 0.1
EG 2 5 0 10 0.73
EPIC-26 (vitality or hormonal symptom) CG 2 3.5 0 8 0.71 1.38 1 0.24
EG 1 4 0 7 0.7
EPIC-26 (bowel domain) CG 4 5.5 1 8 0.17 2.24 0.2 0.38
EG 1 0 0 14 2.46
EPIC-26 (sexual symptom) CG 19 2 11 24 −0.54 −1.93 0.371 0.33
EG 22 6 10 25 −1.1
BDI-II CG 5 4 0 17 1.1 −0.51 1 0.09
EG 5 8 0 20 0.77
myostatin concentration CG 91.91 24.33 65.28 169.76 0.94 −3.83 <0.001 0.66
EG 146.02 49.28 99.38 188.62 −0.14

EG: experimental group; CG: control group; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; Med: median; IQR: interquartile range; Sk: skewness, Z: Z statistic; r: r statistic; p: significance level.