Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;10(13):2946. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132946

Table 5.

Comparative analysis of all measured variables for the EG and the CG at the final assessment.

Parameter Group Med IQR Min Max Sk. Z p r
EPIC-26 (overall urinary difficulties) CG 5 1 3 5 −0.84 4.65 <0.001 0.8
EG 1 0.5 0 4 1
EPIC-26 (incontinence subscale) CG 9 1 7 10 −0.37 3.05 0.008 0.52
EG 6 3 0 9 −1.05
EPIC-26 (irritation/ obstruction subscale) CG 4 5.5 0 9 −0.05 3.54 <0.001 0.61
EG 1 1.5 0 9 2.57
EPIC-26 (vitality or hormonal symptom) CG 5 5 0 15 0.96 3.75 <0.001 0.64
EG 0 1 0 3 1.45
EPIC-26 (bowel domain) CG 6 4.5 1 11 −0.08 3.54 <0.001 0.61
EG 1 1 0 9 2.22
EPIC-26 (sexual symptom) CG 10 1 6 15 0.56 −0.27 0.784 −0.05
EG 10 1 0 22 0.9
EG 1 2.5 0 8 1.18
BDI-II CG 5 6.5 0 15 0.53 2.58 0.03 0.44
EG 1 2.5 0 12 1.95
myostatin concentration CG 91.47 33.2 45.98 162.71 0.34 −1.68 0.184 −0.29
EG 118.25 43.32 63.35 171.53 −0.07

EG: experimental group; CG: control group; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; Med: median; IQR: interquartile range; Sk: skewness, Z: Z statistic; r: r statistic; p: significance level.