Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 25;11:697572. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.697572

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox Regression analysis.

(A)
  Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Variable HR 95% CI p-value HR 95%CI p-value
CTC count 2.098 1.21-3.65 0.009 2.098 1.21-3.65 0.009
Subtype 0.765 0.42-1.38 0.373
BRCA 0.464 0.18-1.22 0.119
BR grade 0.677 0.35-1.32 0.251
Palliative chemo 0.949 0.57-1.60 0.844
Palliative endo 0.820 0.49-1.39 0.458
Visceral metastases 0.846 0.36-1.99 0.700
WHO 0.998 0.56-1.78 0.995
Age 1.022 0.99-1.05 0.145
(B)
  Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Variable HR 95% CI p-value HR 95%CI p-value
CTC count 2.381 1.36-4.18 0.003 2.219 1.26-3.90 0.006
Subtype 0.974 0.54-1.74 0.928
BRCA 0.512 0.18-1.43 0.200
BR grade 0.568 0.29-1.11 0.100
Palliative chemo 2.139 1.22-3.75 0.008 1.958 1.12-3.44 0.019
Palliative endo 0.800 0.47-1.36 0.411
Visceral metastases 1.522 0.65-3.59 0.338
WHO 0.955 0.51-1.79 0.885
Age 1.026 1.00-1.06 0.060

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis (n=65). (A) shows all variables in relation to PFS and (B) in relation to OS. CTC count was analyzed as dichotomized variable (<5 CTCs/≥5 CTCs) and age as continuous variable. For subtype patients were divided in ER+ versus TNBC and for BR (Bloom-Richardson) grade all patients were grade 2 or 3. Palliative chemotherapy was divided in 0-2 and 3-6 lines of chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Palliative endocrine therapies were divided in 0-1 and 2-6 lines of endocrine therapies for advanced breast cancer. WHO stands for WHO performance status and was divided in WHO 0 or WHO 1-2. HR, hazard ratio.

The significant values are shown in bold.