Table 3.
Definition of certainty (quality) in the evidence | ||
---|---|---|
Category | Definition | |
High | We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. | |
Moderate | We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. | |
Low | Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. | |
Very low | We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. | |
Definition of strong and conditional recommendations and implications for users | ||
Implications | Strong recommendations | Conditional recommendations |
For patients | Most individuals in this situation would want the recommended course of action and only a small proportion would not. Formal decision aids are not likely to be needed to help individuals make decisions consistent with their values and preferences. | The majority of individuals in this situation would want the suggested course of action, but many would not. |
For clinicians | Most individuals should receive the intervention. Adherence to this recommendation according to the guideline could be used as a quality criterion or performance indicator. | Recognize that different choices will be appropriate for individual patients and that you must help each patient arrive at a management decision consistent with his or her values and preferences. Decision aids may be useful helping individuals making decisions consistent with their values and preferences. |
For policy makers | The recommendation can be adapted as policy in most situations. | Policymaking will require substantial debate and involvement of various stakeholders. |
Sources: Andrews 2013, Guyatt 2008
Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations—the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):719–725.
Andrews JC, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a rec ommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):726–735.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336(7650):924–6.