Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0254215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254215

Table 2. Access to and actualization of gender-affirming resources among self-identified transgender and nonbinary individuals from the COVID disparities working group survey between April 16 and August 3, 2020 (N = 964).

  Overall (%) Transmasculine Transfeminine Nonbinary p-valueb
Experienced reduced access to one or more gender-affirming resource belowa 320 / 582 (55.0%) 17 / 26 (65.4%) 110 / 189 (58.2%) 193 / 367 (52.6%) 0.25
        Hormone therapy and/or gender-affirming medication 143 / 401 (35.7%) 11 / 20 (55.0%) 61 / 145 (42.1%) 71 / 236 (30.1%) 0.01
        Surgical aftercare 119 / 356 (33.4%) 6 / 14 (42.9%) 51 / 127 (40.2%) 62 / 215 (28.8%) 0.08
        Cosmetic supplies and services, e.g., makeup, wigs, and hair removal 189 / 500 (37.8%) 9 / 21 (42.9%) 65 / 162 (40.1%) 115 / 317 (36.3%) 0.63
        Mental health counseling and therapy* 192 / 448 (42.9%) 13 / 21 (61.9%) 57 / 143 (39.9%) 122 / 284 (43.0%) 0.16
        Body modifiers, e.g., binders and packing material 160 / 443 (36.1%) 8 / 18 (44.4%) 57 / 148 (38.5%) 95 / 277 (34.3%) 0.52
Compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic, how often able to live according to their gender          
        More or a lot more 67 / 860 (7.8%) 7 / 28 (25.0%) 22 / 232 (9.5%) 38 / 600 (7.1%) < 0.001
        About the same 466 (54.2%) 13 (46.4%) 110 (47.4%) 343 (57.2%)  
        Less or not at all 327 (38.0%) 8 (28.6%) 100 (43.1%) 219 (36.5%)  

a Denominators excluded participants who were not presented with these questions, did not respond, or said that the resource was not applicable to them.

b p-values were calculated using chi-squared and Fischer’s exact tests as appropriate