Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 28;17(6):e1009703. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009703

Table 1. Particle density calculation.

Fraction # Rh (nm) Length (nm) PrP monomers per PrPSc particle PrP normalized intensity Relative number of PrPSc particles Max. possible PrPSc particle density (particles/mL)
24 11.6 39.1 78 0.08316 0.001065 3.08E+09
26 15.5 57.8 116 0.102213 0.000884 2.56E+09
28 19.6 80.0 160 0.148777 0.000093 2.69E+09
30 22.9 106.6 213 0.179116 0.000084 2.43E+09
32 26.9 142.1 284 0.224708 0.000079 2.29E+09
34 32.9 175.1 350 0.348884 0.000996 2.88E+09
36 38.7 199.4 399 0.370763 0.000930 2.69E+09
38 46.0 223.5 447 0.322006 0.000720 2.09E+09
40 49.2 253.5 507 0.301998 0.000596 1.72E+09
42 57.6 361.2 722 0.290421 0.000402 1.16E+09
44 69.3 524.2 1048 0.299313 0.000286 8.26E+08
46 77.9 704.0 1408 0.309167 0.000220 6.36E+08 (*)
48 105.6 1621.9 3244 0.394646 0.000122 3.52E+08 (*)

The Rh of particles was calculated from DLS measurements. The length of the particles was calculated fitting the MALS measurements to a rod-shape model. The number of PrP monomers per PrPSc particle was estimated from the PrPSc particle length, assuming a contribution of 0.49 nm in length per PrP monomer based on the recent parallel in-register intermolecular beta sheets (PIRIBS) model for the 263K strain. The PrP normalized intensity was determined by immunoblotting using Sha31 antibody. The relative number of PrPSc particles was calculated by dividing the PrP normalized intensity by number of PrP monomers per PrPSc particle. The maximum possible PrPSc particle density was calculated with ASTRA software (see methods) for fractions 46 and 48, and extrapolated to the rest of the fractions based on the relative number of PrPSc particles. (*) these values of particle density were calculated from MALS measurements directly, fitting the data to a rod-shape model, and assuming a rod radius of 4.25 nm. This calculation was performed for all samples; the specific values obtained for sample HY-E are shown in the table.