Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 9;100(27):e26535. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026535

Table 2.

The analysis for lincRNA-ROR and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with cancer.

Pooled data Test for heterogeneity
Clinicopathological features Number of studies Number of case (n) lincRNA-ROR high expression (n) RR 95% CI P-value Chi2 P-value I2 (%)
Age (<60 vs >60) 9 794 408 0.93 0.81–1.07 .310 7.50 .484 0.0
Gender (male vs female) 14 1130 583 0.99 0.88–1.12 .925 7.78 .858 0.0
Tumor size (cm) (>5 vs <5) 5 425 224 1.82 1.10–3.04 .021 22.42 <.001 82.2
Infiltration depth (T3/T4 vs T1/T2) 4 309 165 1.32 0.87–2.00 .197 10.57 .014 71.6
Differentiation (poor vs well/moderate) 7 467 249 1.15 0.80–1.65 .445 22.84 .001 73.7
TNM stage (III/VI vs I/II) 10 968 504 1.55 1.29–1.88 < .001 21.47 .011 58.1
Clinical stage (III/VI vs I/II) 2 66 33 2.10 1.20–3.67 .009 0.41 .523 0.0
Lymph metastasis (yes vs no) 10 956 495 1.55 1.25–1.94 < .001 24.51 .004 63.3
Metastasis (yes vs no) 7 641 334 1.65 1.26–2.16 < .001 16.98 .009 64.7
Vessel invasion (yes vs no) 3 227 119 1.87 1.42–2.47 < .001 0.54 .763 0.0
Serum CA19–9 (positive vs negative) 3 200 106 0.84 0.63–1.12 .241 1.48 .477 0.0
Serum CEA (positive vs negative) 2 139 75 0.90 0.65–1.24 .514 0.77 .380 0.0

CI = confidence interval, RR = risk ratio.