Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 13;31(8):5851–5862. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07716-0

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors of stent patency in 135 patients with malignant biliary obstruction

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Variable* No. of cases Median stent patency (95%CI)* p HR (95%CI) p$
Gender Male 82 6.1 (5.4–6.8) 0.941
Female 53 6.3 (4.1–8.5)
Age (year) ≥ 65 56 5.6 (4.3–6.9) 0.672
< 65 79 6.5 (5.6–7.4)
EGCO PS + ≥ 2 48 5.6 (4.4–6.8) 0.193
< 2 87 6.5 (5.5–7.5)
Bismuth type ‡ III–IV 31 4.3 (3.2–5.4) 0.000 2.778 (1.765, 4.371) 0.000
I–II 104 6.8 (6.1–7.5)
Distant metastasis Yes 58 5.7 (4.8–6.6) 0.008 1.708 (1.171, 2.491) 0.005
No 77 6.7 (5.9–7.5)
CA 125 (U/mL) > 40 71 5.8 (4.4–7.2) 0.263
≤ 40 64 6.5 (5.8–7.2)
CA 19-9 (U/mL) > 40 118 6.3 (5.4–7.2) 0.222
≤ 40 17 5.9 (4.4–7.4)
Length of stricture (cm) ≥ 4 60 5.2 (4.2–6.2) 0.027 1.727 (1.124, 2.654) 0.013
< 4 75 6.8 (6.0–7.6)
Length of stent (mm) > 6 48 5.8 (4.3–7.3) 0.646
≤ 6 87 6.1 (5.3–6.9)
Stent placement Following 57 6.1 (4.4–7.8) 0.661
Synchronising 78 6.1 (5.2–7.0)

*Stent patency data are in months, and the Kaplan–Meier method was used

The long-rank test was used

$Cox regression was used

+According to the Toxicity and response criteria of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

According to the Bismuth classification of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

CA125/19-9, carbohydrate antigen 125/19-9