Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 18;31(8):5689–5698. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07703-5

Table 4.

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and hypothetical percentage of spared FNA, grouping comparable ultrasound score classes

Risk class (expected malignancy risk) US score classes Sensitivity (CI 95%) Specificity (CI 95%) PPV (CI 95%) NPV (CI 95%) % spared FNA
Low-risk classes, < 5% KTIRADS 2 57.9% (± 5.6%; 52.3–63.5%) 44.3% (± 1.6%; 42.7–45.9%) 7.3% (± 1.0%; 6.3–8.3%) 93.3% (± 1.1%; 92.2–94.4%) 44.2%
ATA benign–very low risk
AACE low
EUTIRADS 2–3
ACRTIRADS 1–2
Intermediate-risk classes, 5–20% KTIRADS3 75.3% (± 2.0%; 73.3–77.3%) 27.2% (± 0.7%; 26.5–27.9%) 8.7% (± 0.4%; 8.3–9.1%) 92.2% (± 0.7%; 91.5–92.9%) 26.9%
ATA low–intermediate
AACE intermediate
EUTIRADS 4
ACRTIRADS 3–4
High-risk classes, > 20% KTIRADS 4–5 98.1% (± 0.7%; 97.4–98.8%) 0.9% (± 0.2%; 0.7–1.1%) 15.7% (± 0.7%; 15.0–16.4%) 72.5% (± 2.4%; 70.1–74.9%) 1.1%
ATA high
AACE high
EUTIRADS 5
ACRTIRADS 5