Table 8.
Correlations between SFT and Tinetti and TUG tests.
| Functional tests | Tinetti balance [points] | Tinetti walk [points] | Tinetti POMA in total [points] |
Test TUG [s] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO | GH | GO | GH | GO | GH | GO | GH | |
| Strength of the upper body part [repetitions/30 s] | 0.359* | 0.313* | 0.258 | 0.063 | 0.343* | 0.278* | − 0.071 | − 0.044 |
| Strength of the lower body part [repetitions/30 s] | 0.385* | 0.347* | 0.308 | 0.105 | 0.395* | 0.321* | − 0.151 | − 0.143 |
|
Aerobic performance capacity [number of steps] |
0.340* | 0.304* | 0.295* | 0.264* | 0.395* | 0.347* | − 0.333* | − 0.313* |
| Suppleness of the upper body part [cm] | 0.180 | 0.137 | 0.085 | 0.097 | 0.094 | 0.148 | − 0.117 | − 0.137 |
| Suppleness of the lower body part [cm] | 0.198* | 0.137 | 0.184* | − 0.103 | 0.163 | 0.072 | − 0.241* | − 0.300* |
(GO—the group of women with osteoporosis, GH—the group of healthy women; * p < 0.05).