Table 1.
Techniques used for non-nanofibrous scaffold fabrication
Method | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref |
---|---|---|---|
Gas foaming |
Free from organic solvents Operates at less temperature |
Inadequate pore interconnectivity Low mechanical strength |
Khang (2017) |
Rapid prototyping |
Ease of attaining desired fiber architecture Controlled geometry, porosity and pore size Custom-made and accurate pore structure No need of supporting material |
High temperature requirement Expensive equipment |
Khang (2017) |
Injectable gel |
Ease of incorporating functional bioactive compounds Intricate scaffolds can be fabricated |
– | Khang (2017) |
Solvent casting |
Simple, easy and cost effective scaffold fabrication Does not demand sophisticated equipment |
Toxic solvents usage More time is required for solvent evaporation Scaffolds might be toxic due to presence of solvent traces |
Subia et al. (2010) |
Particulate-leaching technique |
Process is easy to carry out Scaffolds with precise pore size can be achieved Requires lesser polymer content to fabricate Pore size (~ 500 μm) and 94–95% of porosity |
It is difficult to control inter-pore spacing’s and pore shape | Subia et al. (2010) |
Fiber mesh | Higher surface area | Scaffolds possess less dimensional stability | Subia et al. (2010) |