Table 2.
Behavioral correlation for all REST sessions
| Session | % SUs (bs, ns) |
mean BC (bs, ns) |
|
% SUs (bs, ns) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | 53.9 (50, 60) | 0.13 (0.14, 0.13) | –0.19,  = 0.03 |
54.7 (51.7, 58) |
| E2 | 66.9 (64.2, 71.4) | 0.14 (0.14, 0.15) | –0.09,  = 0.3 |
76.9 (79.1, 76.8) |
| N1 | 40.8 (32.9, 53.3) | 0.10 (0.07, 0.15) | –0.13,  = 0.2 |
48.1 (39, 62.2) |
| N2 | 46.8 (39.7, 54.8) | 0.12 (0.09, 0.14) | –0.04,  = 0.7 |
43.5 (39.7, 50) |
Note: The second column gives the percentage of SUs that show a significant behavioral correlation (BC, 
), the third column gives BC averages, and the fourth column the Spearman rank correlation between average single unit FR and BC (
). Column 5 lists the percentages of SUs that change their firing significantly (
) with the behavioral state, obtained with a Kruskal–Wallis test on M, RS, and RSS. The numbers in brackets indicate the values obtained when separating between bs (first entry) and ns (second entry) SUs. 1 s resolution.