Skip to main content
. 2021 May 18;2(3):tgab033. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab033

Table 7.

Quantification and correlation of balance and dimensionality

Monkey RSS RS M TM PP
Putative excitatory/inhibitory prevalence Inline graphic (bs, ns)
E Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
N Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
Instantaneous balance Inline graphic
E Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
N Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
Participation ratio (PR)
E Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
N Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic
Spearman rank correlation between Inline graphic and PR
E –0.28 –0.13 (Inline graphic) –0.63 (Inline graphic) –0.15 –0.15
N –0.19 –0.14 (Inline graphic) –0.29 (Inline graphic) –0.29 (Inline graphic) 0.16

Note: Top rows: quantification of balance between putative excitatory and inhibitory population activities (Inline graphic(bs, ns) and Inline graphic). Middle row: quantification of dimensionality as measured by the PR. Bottom row: Spearman rank correlation between Inline graphic and PR; only Inline graphic values smaller than 0.05 are listed. All values were obtained from 3 s slices, for different behavioral states in REST (RSS, RS, M) and R2G (TM, PP), pooled across all recordings of the respective type.