Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 26;59:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.06.008

Table 2.

Short-term follow-up; Patients who did not develop breast cancer ipsilateral to the biopsy site (n = 815) compared to patients who did develop breast cancer ipsilateral to the biopsy site (n = 8).

No breast cancer subsequent to biopsy (n = 815) Breast cancer subsequent to biopsy (n = 8) p-value
Mean age ± sd, in years, at moment of first biopsy 55.7 ± 10.3 59.4 ± 10.2 0.243
Referrer 0.004
National screening program 416 (51.0%)
General practitioner 186 (22.8%) 2 (25.0%)
Follow up 209 (25.6%) 6 (75.0%)
Biopsy for other hospital 4 (0.5%)
In case of referral by follow-up, specification reason for follow-up 0.129
History of breast cancer 90 (11.0%) 6 (75.0%)
History/analysis of other malignancy than breast cancer 7 (0.9%)
Family history of breast cancer 42 (5.1%)
Detected benign lesion 65 (8.0%)
Hormonal drug therapy 4 (0.5%)
Preoperative screening 1 (0.1%)
History of breast cancer <0.001
No 717 (88.0%) 2 (25.0%)
Yes 91 (11.2%) 6 (75.0%)
Missing 7 (0.9%)
In case of history of breast cancer, side cancer compared to calcifications 1.000
Ipsilateral 39 (4.9%) 2 (25.0%)
Contralateral 52 (6.4%) 4 (50.0%)
Median time to diagnosis, in years 2.4 (1.1–2.7)
Spatial relationship between future development of ipsilateral breast cancer and previous biopsy site
Biopsy site (biopsied quadrant) 5 (62.5%)
Other quadrant 3 (37.5%)