Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 12;50(3):916–928. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa098

Table 4.

Effect of drinking managed aquifer recharge water on blood pressure and urine protein among study participants compared with brackish groundwater-drinkers

Outcomes Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Regression coefficienta (95% CI) p-value Regression coefficienta (95% CI) p-value Regression coefficienta (95% CI) p-value
Systolic BP in mmHg (mean difference) –0.05 (–1.24, 1.14) 0.932 –0.09 (–1.26, 1.08) 0.880 –0.24 (–1.44, 0.95) 0.690
Diastolic BP in mmHg (mean difference) –0.24 (–0.91, 0.43) 0.487 –0.31 (–1.00, 0.37) 0.368 –0.43 (–1.11, 0.26) 0.222
Mean arterial pressure in mmHg (mean difference) –0.19 (–0.99, 0.62) 0.652 –0.24 (–1.04, 0.56) 0.557 –0.36 (–1.17, 0.45) 0.384
Pulse pressure in mmHg (mean difference) 0.26 (–0.43, 0.96) 0.457 0.26 (–0.40, 0.93) 0.439 0.17 (–0.52, 0.86) 0.630
Urinary total protein (ratio of medians) 0.90 (0.78, 1.04) 0.154 0.89 (0.78, 1.03) 0.114 0.89 (0.78, 1.02) 0.100
a

Refers to difference in mean blood pressure of participants or ratio of medians of 24-hour urinary protein of participants between communities with access to managed aquifer recharge water and without access.

N = 1891 person-visits for managed aquifer recharge water access group and N = 695 person-visits for brackish groundwater group

Model 1: adjusted for visit only; Model 2: adjusted for visit, age, sex and body mass index; Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, marital status, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol consumption, hours of sleep, religion, salt intake and wealth quintile.