Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 9;50(3):841–851. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa271

Table 2.

Relative risk ratio (RRR) of transitioning between disability states in the second Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (CFAS II) compared with CFAS I, overall and by deprivation group, 95% confidence interval (CI) in parentheses

RRR (95% CI)
Gender Socioeconomic status No disability to disability No disability to death Disability to no disability Disability to death
Men All 0.8 (0.6–0.9) 0.5 (0.4–0.6) 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 0.8 (0.7–0.9)
Most advantaged 0.9 (0.6–1.2) 0.4 (0.3–0.6) 1.8 (1.0–3.2) 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
Mid advantaged 0.7 (0.5–1.0) 0.4 (0.2–0.7) 1.0 (0.6–1.8) 0.8 (0.7–1.0)
Least advantaged 0.7 (0.5–1.0) 0.7 (0.4–1.3) 1.0 (0.5–1.8) 0.7 (0.6–0.9)
Women All 0.7 (0.6–0.8) 0.7 (0.4–1.1) 1.1 (0.9–1.4) 0.9 (0.8–1.0)
Most advantaged 0.7 (0.5–0.8) 0.7 (0.4–1.6) 0.8 (0.6–1.2) 0.9 (0.8–1.1)
Mid advantaged 0.6 (0.5–0.8) 0.7 (0.4–1.4) 1.5 (1.0–2.4) 0.9 (0.8–1.1)
Least advantaged 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 0.5 (0.2–1.6) 1.1 (0.7–1.6) 0.9 (0.7–1.0)

For overall RRR, models stratified by sex with study as covariate. For socioeconomic status (SES) group RRR, models stratified by sex and SES group with study as covariate.