Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 10;9(4):299–339. doi: 10.1007/s40336-021-00445-w

Table 2.

Classification for [18F]FDG findings suggested by the EANM Procedural recommendations for PET/CT imaging of CS

Modified from [110]

[18F]FDG PET/CT finding Perfusion finding (SPECT or PET) CMR findings Final interpretation
No [18F]FDG uptake Normal No LGE No CS (< 10%)
Diffused [18F]FDG uptake (homogeneous) Normal No LGE Uptake most likely due to suboptimal patient preparation
Isolated lateral wall [18F]FDG uptake Normal No LGE Uptake possibly related to a normal variant
No [18F]FDG uptake Small perfusion defect One focal area of LGE (alternative diagnosis are most likely) Possible CS (50–90%)
Focal area of [18F]FDG uptake Normal
No [18F]FDG uptake Multiple non-contiguous areas of perfusion defect Typical LGE Probable CS (50–90%)
Focal or focal on diffused[18F]FDG uptake Resting perfusion defect
Focal area of [18F]FDG uptake + extracardiac findings Normal Typical LGE Active cardiac sarcoidosis (> 90%)
Focal on diffused[18F]FDG uptake Perfusion defect Typical LGE Active inflammation with scar in the same location with either diffused inflammation or suboptimal preparation
Focal area of [18F]FDG uptake in an area of normal perfusion Perfusion defect Typical LGE Presence of both inactive scar and inflammation in different segments of the myocardium or inactive scar and false-positive physiological [18F]FDG uptake

LGE late gadolinium enhancement