Table 3.
Optimization results of TOA and compared algorithms on unimodal test function.
MPA | TSA | WOA | GWO | TLBO | GSA | PSO | GA | TOA | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ave | 3.2715 × 10−21 | 7.71 × 10−38 | 2.1741 × 10−9 | 1.09 × 10−58 | 8.3373 × 10−60 | 2.0255 × 10−17 | 1.7740 × 10−5 | 13.2405 | 0 | |
std | 4.6153 × 10−21 | 7.00 × 10−21 | 7.3985 × 10−25 | 5.1413 × 10−74 | 4.9436 × 10−76 | 1.1369 × 10−32 | 6.4396 × 10−21 | 4.7664 × 10−15 | 0 | |
Ave | 1.57 × 10−12 | 8.48 × 10−39 | 0.5462 | 1.2952 × 10−34 | 7.1704 × 10−35 | 2.3702 × 10−8 | 0.3411 | 2.4794 | 0 | |
std | 1.42 × 10−12 | 5.92 × 10−41 | 1.7377 × 10−16 | 1.9127 × 10−50 | 6.6936 × 10−50 | 5.1789 × 10−24 | 7.4476 × 10−17 | 2.2342 × 10−15 | 0 | |
Ave | 0.0864 | 1.15 × 10−21 | 1.7634 × 10−8 | 7.4091 × 10−15 | 2.7531 × 10−15 | 279.3439 | 589.492 | 1536.8963 | 0 | |
std | 0.1444 | 6.70 × 10−21 | 1.0357 × 10−23 | 5.6446 × 10−30 | 2.6459 × 10−31 | 1.2075 × 10−13 | 7.1179 × 10−13 | 6.6095 × 10−13 | 0 | |
Ave | 2.6 × 10−8 | 1.33 × 10−23 | 2.9009 × 10−5 | 1.2599 × 10−14 | 9.4199 × 10−15 | 3.2547 × 10−9 | 3.9634 | 2.0942 | 0 | |
std | 9.25 × 10−9 | 1.15 × 10−22 | 1.2121 × 10−20 | 1.0583 × 10−29 | 2.1167 × 10−30 | 2.0346 × 10−24 | 1.9860 × 10−16 | 2.2342 × 10−15 | 0 | |
Ave | 46.049 | 28.8615 | 41.7767 | 26.8607 | 146.4564 | 36.10695 | 50.26245 | 310.4273 | 26.2476 | |
std | 0.4219 | 4.76 × 10−3 | 2.5421 × 10−14 | 0 | 1.9065 × 10−14 | 3.0982 × 10−14 | 1.5888 × 10−14 | 2.0972 × 10−13 | 3.26× 10−14 | |
Ave | 0.398 | 7.10 × 10−21 | 1.6085 × 10−9 | 0.6423 | 0.4435 | 0 | 20.25 | 14.55 | 0 | |
std | 0.1914 | 1.12 × 10−25 | 4.6240 × 10−25 | 6.2063 × 10−17 | 4.2203 × 10−16 | 0 | 1.2564 | 3.1776 × 10−15 | 0 | |
Ave | 0.0018 | 3.72 × 10−4 | 0.0205 | 0.0008 | 0.0017 | 0.0206 | 0.1134 | 5.6799 × 10−3 | 9.92× 10−6 | |
std | 0.001 | 5.09 × 10−5 | 1.5515 × 10−18 | 7.2730 × 10−20 | 3.8789 × 10−19 | 2.7152 × 10−18 | 4.3444 × 10−17 | 7.7579 × 10−19 | 1.74 × 10−20 |