Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;118(27):e2019339118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2019339118

Table 1.

Comparison of this UoC to state-of-the-art ultrasound ASIC designs

Ref.
This work 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Process 130 nm BCD+MEMS 1.5 µm HV 28 nm 180 nm HV SOI 180 nm 180 nm 180 nm BCD SOI 350 nm CMUT-in-CMOS
Transducer 2D CMUT 2D CMUT 2D CMUT 2D PZT 2D PZT 2D PMUT 2D CMUT 2D CMUT
No. of TX/RX elements 8,960/8,960 256/256 0/16 128/3072 0/144 36/36 256/256 0/960
Operating frequency 1–10 MHz 5 MHz 5 MHz 5 MHz 5 MHz 5 MHz 7 MHz 5 MHz
Pitch-matched ✓ (208 µm) × ✓ (250 µm) ✓ (300 µm) ✓ (150 µm) ✓ (250 µm) ✓ (220 µm) ✓ (162 µm)
Multilevel pulsing ✓ (7-level) × × ✓ (3-level) × × × ×
TX beamforming ✓ (digital) ✓ (digital) × ✓ (digital) × × × ×
RX beamforming ✓ (digital) × ✓ (digital) ✓ (analog) ✓ (analog) ✓ (analog) × ×
On-chip TGC ✓ (0.2 dB/step) × ✓ (0.33 dB/step) × ✓ (6 dB/step) ✓ (6 dB/step) × ✓ (4.3 dB/step)
On-chip ADC ✓ (1,120 ch) × ✓ (16 ch) × ✓ (16 ch) ✓ (36 ch) × ×
On-chip DSP × × × × × × ×