Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 24;21(13):4331. doi: 10.3390/s21134331

Table 3.

Classification performance of the proposed approach compared with the relevant CNN-based methods.

Methods Input Length Network Validation F1N F1A F1O F1P F1_NAO F_NAOP Visual
Interpretation
[56] 30 s ResNet (34 layers) 5-fold CV 90.2 65.7 69.8 64.0 75.2 72.4 None
[57] N/A 2D CNN with LSTM layer 5-fold CV 88.8 76.4 72.6 64.5 79.2 75.58 None
[54] 9, 15 s DenseNet 5-fold CV 91 80 76 N/A 82 N/A None
[55] 9–61 s 16-layer 1D residual CRNN 5-fold CV 91.9 85.8 81.6 N/A 86.4 N/A None
[52] 30 s 1D CNN 5-fold CV N/A N/A N/A N/A 82.2 78.2 None
[53] 60.5 s Modified ResNet 8:1:1 split N/A N/A N/A N/A 79.59 N/A Included
[58] 9–61 s Dense18+ for spectrogram 10-fold CV 89.29 79.18 72.25 52.50 80.24 73.31 Included
Proposed 9–61 s Proposed BIT-CNN 5-fold CV 89.73 81.06 74.45 62.22 81.75 76.87 Included