Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 11.
Published in final edited form as: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 23;93(1):156–163. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27831

TABLE 3.

Factors associated with NYHA functional class at follow-upa

Covariates Odds ratio (95% CI) P value
Univariable analysis
Baseline data Age (years) 0.96 0.93–0.99 0.010
Postprocedural data LA pressure (mmHg) 1.03 0.96–1.10 0.387
Transvalvular gradient (mmHg) 1.06 0.94–1.19 0.368
MPAP (mmHg) 1.01 0.97–1.05 0.664
Mitral valve area (cm2) 4.88 0.95–25.07 0.058
Moderate mitral regurgitation 0.75 0.29–1.91 0.544
Changes in the variablesb Changes in LA pressure (mmHg) 0.97 0.91–1.02 0.219
Changes in LA compliance (mL/mmHg) 1.36 1.00–1.85 0.045
Changes in BNP (pg/mL) 0.48 0.22–1.07 0.075
Changes in mitral valve gradient (mmHg) 0.45 0.17–1.20 0.110
Multivariable analysisc
Age (years) 0.95 0.92–0.98 0.004
Changes in LA compliance (mL/mmHg) 1.42 1.02–1.97 0.037
a

Total of 130 patients were included in the analysis, 7 patients were excluded due to severe mitral regurgitation after the procedure

b

Percentage change was calculated using this formula: Post-Pre/Pre × 100%.

c

Multivariable analysis after adjustment for immediate procedural results: postprocedural mitral valve area, MPAP, and mean transvalvular gradient.

Abbreviation: LA, left atrial.